Re: Hipot testing following fault testing

2006-03-22 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In message de87437fe365cb458c265ea3d73b6f1dd99...@xbc-mail1.xantrex.com, dated Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Ralph McDiarmid ralph.mcdiar...@xantrex.com writes If reinforced insulation provides 2 levels of protection, then why assume 2 levels remain after application of a single-fault? The 60950

RE: Hipot testing following fault testing

2006-03-22 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 9:55 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: FW: Hipot testing following fault testing Thanks Ralph - good catch. So it appears the committee I'm on has come up with an idea that is not unique and has precedent in 61010-1. For those interested in this thread

RE: Hipot testing following fault testing

2006-03-22 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
9:55 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: FW: Hipot testing following fault testing Thanks Ralph - good catch. So it appears the committee I'm on has come up with an idea that is not unique and has precedent in 61010-1. For those interested in this thread, here's how

RE: Hipot testing following fault testing

2006-03-21 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Peter Tarver Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 1:56 PM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Hipot testing following fault testing Hi, Jim. Based on your question, it appears you're discussing faults of insulation

RE: Hipot testing following fault testing

2006-03-21 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org]On Behalf Of Jim Eichner Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 4:35 PM To: Peter Tarver; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Hipot testing following fault testing The scenario we were really thinking of is in your paragraph starting with However

RE: Hipot testing following fault testing

2006-03-20 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
message. From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Peter Tarver Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 1:56 PM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: Hipot testing following fault testing Hi, Jim. Based on your question, it appears you're discussing faults of insulation. On that basis

RE: Hipot testing following fault testing

2006-03-20 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hi, Jim. Based on your question, it appears you're discussing faults of insulation. On that basis, no faulting of Reinforced Insulation is called for. However, if faults: on the component containing the Reinforced Insulation (say, overload testing of a transformer, per Annex C1) [the

Hipot testing following fault testing

2006-03-17 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Here's an interesting question that came up during a standards committee meeting. I'll base the question on EN60950-1 although this approach and the question it raises are universal. Fault testing is required in section 5.3 and compliance criteria includes hipot testing according to 5.3.8