Re: Hot Surface. Hot air.

1999-10-11 Thread Rich Nute
AAA88; > Fri, 8 Oct 1999 10:48:58 +0200 > Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19991008103813.00798590@194.132.55.100> > X-Sender: pmerguerian@194.132.55.100 > X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) > Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 10:38:13 +0200 > To: Rich Nute , isra

RE: Hot Surface. Hot air.

1999-10-08 Thread Ing. Gert Gremmen
designer http://www.cetest.nl/features01.htm -Original Message- From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Israel Yeshurun Sent: donderdag 7 oktober 1999 12:43 To: 'emc-p...@ieee.org' Subject: Hot Surface. Hot

Re: Hot Surface. Hot air.

1999-10-08 Thread Peter Merguerian
Rich, You state: "Unfortunately, the authors of our various safety standards chose the BOGSAT* method of determining safety rather than doing research." Why don't you discuss the BOGSAT with Richard Pescatore, the Chairman of the WG7 Technical Committee; I believe he represents your company Hew

Re: Hot Surface. Hot air.

1999-10-08 Thread Matthew Meehan
> Now, 70 degrees C for external equipment surface that may be touched > seems pretty high to me. 100 degrees C metal surface will, I believe, cause > a burn to that part of the human body that touched it. > So maybe my interpretation is not true ??and, can someone point > anothe

Re: Hot Surface. Hot air.

1999-10-08 Thread Rich Nute
Hello Israel: Unfortunately, safety standards only address one of the critical parameters, temperature, when specifying requirements for protection against a burn injury. You are absolutely correct that a metal surface with a temperature exceeding 50 C is capable of producing a burn injury

RE: Hot Surface. Hot air.

1999-10-07 Thread Alan Brewster
http://www.ccsemc.com > -Original Message- > From: Israel Yeshurun [SMTP:israel_yeshu...@stcl.scitex.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 07, 1999 3:43 AM > To: 'emc-p...@ieee.org' > Subject: Hot Surface. Hot air. > > > > Dear Group Fellow

Re: Hot Surface. Hot air.

1999-10-07 Thread Patty Elliot
I have a copy of a standard EN 563:1994, "Safety of machinery - Temperatures of touchable surfaces - Ergonomics data to establish temperature limit values for hot surfaces". It is only 18 pages but includes charts and graphs of burn threshold vs contact time for plastic, metal, and ceramic materia

RE: Hot Surface. Hot air.

1999-10-07 Thread Jim Eichner
est. > -Original Message- > From: Israel Yeshurun [SMTP:israel_yeshu...@stcl.scitex.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 07, 1999 3:43 AM > To: 'emc-p...@ieee.org' > Subject: Hot Surface. Hot air. > > > > Dear Group Fellows > > I would lik

Hot Surface. Hot air.

1999-10-07 Thread Peter E. Perkins
Here's a post from 1997... I don't know where I got the following chart, but I believe it's from the The Shriners Burn Institute. Someone else gave it to me. If anyone recognizes this list, I would really like to know. I assume I'm quoting someone, so I take absolutely no credit for it.

Re: Hot Surface. Hot air.

1999-10-07 Thread Art Michael
Hello Israel, I've not checked your numbers but believe the rationale is, in the case of Item 1) below: that should one come into contact with a surface at these temperatures, one will withdraw quickly and no damage is anticipated. And, in the case of Item 2) below: should one come into contact

Hot Surface. Hot air.

1999-10-07 Thread Israel Yeshurun
Dear Group Fellows I would like to raise the following two issues: 1) UL1950 / EN60950 Safety standards, Subclause 5.1 - Heating, Table 16 part 2, specify permissible temperature rise for external surfaces of equipment in Operator Access Area.. For external surfaces, made