I read in !emc-pstc that Charles Grasso wrote
(in ) about 'ITE Class A vs B
Emissions', on Tue, 5 Feb 2002:
>Has the CE+CE=CE idea been adopted?
Absolutely not in general, only for electrical switchboards, AIUI.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmw
I read in !emc-pstc that John Juhasz wrote
(in <2a1845f4cde8d511b4400090279c703b938...@bctexc10.na.ilxi.net>) about
'ITE Class A vs B Emissions', on Tue, 5 Feb 2002:
>I believe the push to ensure Class B for other than
>'heavy' industrial,
'Pus
Thanks to everyone that responded to my query. Here is my original question
and a synopsis of the replies.
Question:
We currently design our products to comply with the Class B emissions limits
of EN 55022, but I am getting a lot of pressure from engineering to allow
the limits to be raised to
le
EM performance.
From:
Reply-To:
To:
Subject: SV: ITE Class A vs B Emissions
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 09:29:30 +0100
From chapter 4.1 in CISPR 22:1997: "Class B ITE is intended primarily for
use in the domestic environment and my include: - equipment with no fixed
place of use; f
Hi - I must ask:
Has the CE+CE=CE idea been adopted?
If so then the discussion on emissions levels is moot
as non-compliant products are being released on
the market place anyway.
From: "CE-TEST"
Reply-To: "CE-TEST"
To: ,
Subject: RE: ITE Class A vs B Emissions
Date: T
I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in ) about 'SV: ITE Class A vs B
Emissions', on Tue, 5 Feb 2002:
>But I also recall that may
>test laboratories / notified body classifies class A as a heavy industrial
>environment. Business/office environment are
I read in !emc-pstc that Enci wrote (in <3.0.6.32.2
0020205082333.00aed...@mail.cinepower.com>) about 'ITE Class A vs B
Emissions', on Tue, 5 Feb 2002:
>I have often wondered exactly why there are two classes in EN55022. The
>limits are pretty similar, does a 13dB d
a residential
environment. This is even apparent within many metropolitan
areas in the U.S.
John Juhasz
Fiber Options
Bohemia, NY
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:40 PM
Subject: ITE Class A vs B Emissions
>
> We currently design our products to comply w
-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
am...@westin-emission.no
Sent: dinsdag 5 februari 2002 9:30
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: SV: ITE Class A vs B Emissions
>From chapter 4.1 in CISPR 22:1997: "Class B ITE is intended p
ee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]På vegne av
richwo...@tycoint.com
Sendt: 4. februar 2002 22:40
Til: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Emne: ITE Class A vs B Emissions
We currently design our products to comply with the Class B emissions limits
of EN 55022, but I am getting a lot of pressure
ple. In the radiated emissions the difference is 10dB. In the real
world is there really a need for two limits?
Enci
>- Original Message -
>From:
>To:
>Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:40 PM
>Subject: ITE Class A vs B Emissions
>
>
>>
>> We currentl
ions where small
signals are involved, and interference would be likely).
Mike Harris/Teccom
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:40 PM
Subject: ITE Class A vs B Emissions
>
> We currently design our products to comply with the Class B emissions
limi
We currently design our products to comply with the Class B emissions limits
of EN 55022, but I am getting a lot of pressure from engineering to allow
the limits to be raised to Class A. The equipment is intended for business
use only. I understand that Class A is legal in the EU for business
equi
13 matches
Mail list logo
