IEEE EMC Chicago Chapter meeting Tonight IEC Conducted Immunity Standards Edition 2 Updates 2004 - 2009

IEC 61000-4-2, -4, -5, -11 standards revisions and their implications to the practicing EMC Test Engineer For additional details, see our website, http://www.emcchicago.org Hope to see you there. Frank Krozel Frank Krozel http://www.electronicinstrument.com Tel: 630-924-1600 - This

SV: SV: Immunity Standards

not make any evaluation before the date of DOP ? Amund -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org [mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]På vegne av John Woodgate Sendt: 8. februar 2002 00:45 Til: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Emne: Re: SV: Immunity Standards I read in !emc

RE: SV: Immunity Standards

...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: SV: Immunity Standards I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in LFENJLPMMJB mhpeibnilceleccaa.am...@westin-emission.no) about 'SV: Immunity Standards', on Thu, 7 Feb 2002: CENELEC has proposed DOW July 1 2004. But first it must be published

Re: SV: Immunity Standards

I read in !emc-pstc that am...@westin-emission.no wrote (in LFENJLPMMJB mhpeibnilceleccaa.am...@westin-emission.no) about 'SV: Immunity Standards', on Thu, 7 Feb 2002: CENELEC has proposed DOW July 1 2004. But first it must be published in the Official Journal. Are you sure that it has

SV: Immunity Standards

20:11 Til: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Emne: RE: Immunity Standards Is 61000-6-1 the replacement for 50082-1? If so, when is the date of withdrawl for 50082-1? Thanks, Jennifer --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical

Re: Immunity Standards

I read in !emc-pstc that Jennifer Banh jb...@bb-elec.com wrote (in ndbblhfjolohjickdldomebpcnaa.jb...@bb-elec.com) about 'Immunity Standards', on Thu, 7 Feb 2002: Is 61000-6-1 the replacement for 50082-1? If so, when is the date of withdrawl for 50082-1? 2004-07-01. -- Regards, John Woodgate

RE: Immunity Standards

: cecil.gitt...@kodak.com [SMTP:cecil.gitt...@kodak.com] Sent: 06 February 2002 14:17 To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject:Immunity Standards Hi group, I have question concerning the differences of EN50082-1:92 and EN50082-1:97 Immunity Stadards? Regards

RE: Immunity Standards

Is 61000-6-1 the replacement for 50082-1? If so, when is the date of withdrawl for 50082-1? Thanks, Jennifer --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at:

RE: Immunity Standards

Very good point! Chris -Original Message- From: John Woodgate [SMTP:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] Sent: 07 February 2002 11:03 To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Re: Immunity Standards I read in !emc-pstc that Colgan, Chris chris.col...@tagmclaren.com wrote

RE: Immunity Standards

EN50082-1:1997 is going to be replaced by EN 61000-6-1:2001. Enci Hi group, I have question concerning the differences of EN50082-1:92 and EN50082-1:97 Immunity Stadards? Regards Cecil --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society

Re: Immunity Standards

I read in !emc-pstc that Colgan, Chris chris.col...@tagmclaren.com wrote (in AE0F4BD08FEAD211895900805FE67B1F01090EE7@CAT) about 'Immunity Standards', on Thu, 7 Feb 2002: If your question is what are the differences? the answer is considerable. It is beyond the scope of this forum to list

RE: Immunity Standards

: Immunity Standards Hi group, I have question concerning the differences of EN50082-1:92 and EN50082-1:97 Immunity Stadards? Regards Cecil --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc

Re: Immunity Standards

I read in !emc-pstc that cecil.gitt...@kodak.com wrote (in OFE4B08CCA.7 e649265-on85256b58.004e1...@kodak.com) about 'Immunity Standards', on Wed, 6 Feb 2002: I have question concerning the differences of EN50082-1:92 and EN50082-1:97 Immunity Stadards? Have you? How much do we have to pay

Immunity Standards

Hi group, I have question concerning the differences of EN50082-1:92 and EN50082-1:97 Immunity Stadards? Regards Cecil --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site

RE: implantable cardiac pacemaker immunity standards

[mailto:aaron.s@lmco.com] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:11 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: implantable cardiac pacemaker immunity standards Good morning all, I would like to know if implantable pacemakers are generally tested to 200V/m field strength levels at RADAR frequencies

RE: implantable cardiac pacemaker immunity standards

-Bake-Shock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis -Original Message- From: Low, Aaron S [mailto:aaron.s@lmco.com] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 8:11 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: implantable cardiac pacemaker immunity standards Good morning all, I would like to know

implantable cardiac pacemaker immunity standards

Good morning all, I would like to know if implantable pacemakers are generally tested to 200V/m field strength levels at RADAR frequencies (~400MHz - several GHz). If the designers and producers do, are they required to? This information is needed for radiation hazard analyses. Thank you

RE: Immunity standards equivalence?

To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: Immunity standards equivalence? Has EN 50140:94 (EMC/basic; radiated RF EM field immunity) been replaced by EN61000-4-3('99)? Are they identical? At USD120, I want to confirm there's some difference 'tween the two. Under the auspices of EN61326:97

SV: Immunity standards equivalence?

...@aol.com Sendt: 6. november 2001 21:39 Til: emc-p...@ieee.org Emne: Immunity standards equivalence? Has EN 50140:94 (EMC/basic; radiated RF EM field immunity) been replaced by EN61000-4-3('99)? Are they identical? At USD120, I want to confirm there's some difference 'tween the two. Under

Immunity standards equivalence?

Has EN 50140:94 (EMC/basic; radiated RF EM field immunity) been replaced by EN61000-4-3('99)? Are they identical? At USD120, I want to confirm there's some difference 'tween the two. Under the auspices of EN61326:97 (...measurement, control and laboratory equipment EMC), the former doesn't

RE: ITE Immunity Standards / EN 55024

I hope this belated response to Rick Busche's request for information before Christmas will be of help. My understanding of the situation is as follows: 1. The draft of CISPR 24 is now in a fairly advanced stage - the final draft is supposed to be circulated this month as CISPR/G/113/FDIS. 2.