Doug,
You may find the following usefull
ftp://ftp.t11.org/t11/pub/fc/10gfc/01-276v0.pdf
Although titled 'Laser Safety for Parallel Optic Products' the fist few
pages deal with changes in eyesafety generally
Dave
Massey, Doug C. wrote:
>
> Hello Group -
>
> Can anyone direct me to an infor
, Massey, Doug C.
inimitably wrote:
>Of greater concern is the lack of a specified transition period and
>mandatory compliance dates in either standard (at least I can't find them).
>Will existing laser classifications be grandfathered? When will laser
>product manufacturers be required to label
ge-
From: Massey, Doug C. [mailto:masse...@ems-t.com]
Sent: 11 June 2001 21:55
To: 'IEEE Forum'
Subject: New laser standards
Hello Group -
Can anyone direct me to an informative article, link, etc., that summarizes
the impact of Amendment 2 to IEC 60825-1, released in January of
Hello all,
Doug has brought up some interesting questions. I too would like to follow
this thread.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Massey, Doug C. [mailto:masse...@ems-t.com]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 1:55 PM
To: 'IEEE Forum'
Subject: New laser standards
Hello Group -
Hello Group -
Can anyone direct me to an informative article, link, etc., that summarizes
the impact of Amendment 2 to IEC 60825-1, released in January of this year ?
I've reviewed the amendment and am aware of the basic differences it brings
in classification, but it sure would be nice to have a
5 matches
Mail list logo
