to comply with RoHS as it is
part of the car.
A Laptop PC used in military or other exempt product - would have to
comply because it can function outside the exempt host equipment.
Sounds like most of your peripherals would need to comply but as I guess
you buy them in then I would suggest
...@netzero.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 2:34 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RoHS for Exempt Equipment Peripherals
Greetings,
Our products fall under Category 8 & 9 of Annex 1A of the WEEE Directive.
At this time Categories 8 & 9 are exempt from the RoHS Directive. However,
we ship c
Greetings,
Our products fall under Category 8 & 9 of Annex 1A of the WEEE Directive. At
this time Categories 8 & 9 are exempt from the RoHS Directive. However, we
ship computers, scanners, routers, power cords, etc with our equipment.
Sometimes these peripherals may be shipped separat
(781) 740-3368 and immediately delete this message and all its
attachments. Thank you.
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Flinders, Randall
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Emc-Pstc (E-mail)
Subject: BSMI apprived peripherals
Greetings everyone!
We are currently searching for BSMI approved peripherals (keyboard, mouse,
serial, parallel, and USB) for use in BSMI certification of PC devices. Can
anyone recommend specific peripherals that they have found to provide a
favorable emissions profile when compared to Cispr
Has something changed in the FCC rules concerning the addition of
identical port connections? I never remember the exact paragraph but in
essence the requirement was to keep addition cabling (or peripherals) until
the addition resulted in less than 2 dB of change, and then back off by 1
Hi Roger,
I think when they say that they want worse case, they are referring to
maximizing possible emissions from a test set up (using any compliant
devices as peripherals).
If they were to request that you use the most rf-emitting peripherals that
you can find, you'd be testing with a
valid any of the required peripherals (or PC components) that your company
makes must be used in the 'good system to support your EUT.
John Mowbray
> -Original Message-
> From: roger...@astec-asia.com [SMTP:roger...@astec-asia.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 03,
I heard from the test lab that you can use a "good system" as your
peripherals to test your EUT rather than test it with a "worst system"
to obtain worst case for CE and FCC compliance, is that right? As I
know for CE and FCC, they only require a &quo
Reply Separator _____
Subject: Re: Peripherals
Author: at SMTPGWY
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:9/1/98 8:36 AM
Gary,
I have had my problems with support equipment and peripherals also. And,
having used a lot of big name products, mostly computers, etc., I was
surp
Mark, all,
I stand corrected:
> FCC part 15.31(i) requires that the peripherals be unmodified,
^
> commercially available devices.
This section applies regardless of whether the product is
FCC-certified, verified, or whether a DofC is issued.
I ha
In order to meet the requirements of the EMC Directive, it has always
been my understanding that the complete system must be tested. This
refers to any peripherals that are necessary to operate the EUT and
any other peripherals that the manufacturer states are part of the
(i) requires that the peripherals be unmodified,
commercially available devices.
ANSI C63.4 section 11 defines the minimum system configuration for
computer peripherals and clearly shows, in section 6, the host PC and
accompanying peripherals located on the test table. The last amendment
to
The last time I asked the FCC for a ruling, I was told that peripherals
used for a "typical system" that were not sold with the EUT but required
for the EUT to function could not be modified, covered up, shielded, moved
out of the test area, etc. and had to be tested with the EUT. The e
om
> Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: RE: Peripherals
> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1998 13:29:47 -0700
> MIME-Version: 1.0
>
> Dan,
> Thank you very much for providing the paragraphs. I happen to be
> away from my office and can't get to these documents handily. I f
the single sample I
happen to be looking at. Its more that I don't have the time in the
schedule, or the nature to mess around during tests. I look for rock
solid peripherals and won't use one unless I first check it out and am
satisfied that it not only meets the limits but provides som
All,
I believe you guys are referring to 47CFR2.1033,
Application for certification:
(8) If the equipment for which certification is being sought
must be tested with peripheral or accessory devices connected
or installed, a brief description of those peripherals or
Gary,
I have had my problems with support equipment and peripherals also. And,
having used a lot of big name products, mostly computers, etc., I was
surprised at how many of them failed when my product was turned off and
theirs was left running. It is quite common for test house guys to say &quo
mei 1998 19:17
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject:RE: Loop back or peripherals for EMI testing
Hi Gert,
As far as I know, most of test labs think more than 1 meter is a reasonable
length of cable in the real life. They don't use at least 3 meters. But I
agree with what you said abou
rdomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Jim To
Sent: woensdag 13 mei 1998 23:40
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject:Loop back or peripherals for EMI testing
Hello EMI colleagues,
It is a general practice among us to select peripherals (printers,
monitors, etc.) that do not contribute noi
f Jim To
Sent: woensdag 13 mei 1998 23:40
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject:Loop back or peripherals for EMI testing
Hello EMI colleagues,
It is a general practice among us to select peripherals (printers,
monitors, etc.) that do not contribute noise to the EUT during testin
Hello EMI colleagues,
It is a general practice among us to select peripherals (printers,
monitors, etc.) that do not contribute noise to the EUT during testing.
Once these peripherals are found, they are used as basis for testing with
different EUT's. My question is this: Is it leg
Hello EMI colleagues,
It is a general practice among us to select peripherals (printers,
monitors, etc.) that do not contribute noise to the EUT during testing.
Once these peripherals are found, they are used as basis for testing with
different EUT's. My question is this: Is it leg
== Original Message Follows
>> Date: 09-Sep-97 15:13:25 MsgID: 1055-22656 ToID: 72146,373
From: Rick Busche >INTERNET:rbus...@es.com
Subj: "Heavy Industrial" Peripherals
Chrg: $0.00 Imp: Norm Sens: StdReceipt: NoP
My company manufactures large main-frame computer devices for commercial
and military simulation environments. As such, our IGs (Image
Generators) are CE marked and tested to "Heavy Industrial" immunity and
emission levels. Attached to these IGs, are "off-the-shelf" peripheral
devices such as monit
25 matches
Mail list logo
