200105211432.kaa24...@interlock2.lexmark.com, oover...@lexmark.com
inimitably wrote:
I once read a safety article (tongue-in-cheek I believe) that said that the
safety industry was weaking the species by allowing the weak and feable to
continue exist and procreate. I believe that this was
: Friday, May 18, 2001 4:40 PM
To: 'Michael Mertinooke'; wo...@sensormatic.com;
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if
you don't have the time.
Here in the US, awhile back, a woman was suing the liquor industry
because she gave
@interlock.lexmark.com,
woods%sensormatic@interlock.lexmark.com,
emc-pstc%majordomo.ieee@interlock.lexmark.com
cc:(bcc: Oscar Overton/Lex/Lexmark)
Subject: Re: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you
Gary,
Kudos to you for trying;-- but I think you
Subject: RE: Public Health and Safety Signs - Tomfoolery so delete if you
Here in the US, awhile back, a woman was suing the liquor industry
because she gave birth to a fetal alcohol syndrome child. Apparently, nobody
in their right mind would assume that consuming a fifth of whiskey a day
could
, just where are they going to put it so that people, can
easily read it!
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mertinooke [mailto:mertino...@skyskan.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 12:37 PM
To: wo...@sensormatic.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Public Health and Safety
signs at work. Is there a similar Directive for health and safety signs for
the general public?
Whoo! The mind boggles! You mean with like people with exclamation
point in triangle tattoos on various portions of the anatomy? Or
biohazard labels on the door of the kids' rooms? Judging
from some
EU Directive 92/58/EEC specifies the requirements for health and safety
signs at work. Is there a similar Directive for health and safety signs for
the general public?
---
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee
7 matches
Mail list logo
