RE(2): Question on 15.31, Near-field

sometimes we would like to). Don -- From: Meyerhoff Jerry-G10812[SMTP:g10...@email.mot.com] Reply To: Meyerhoff Jerry-G10812 Sent: Friday, January 21, 2000 11:01 AM To: 'rehel...@mmm.com'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: RE: Question on 15.31, Near

Re: RE: Question on 15.31, Near-field

: Friday, January 21, 2000 5:50 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Question on 15.31 I have not heard back fron the FCC on the following question. Does anyone have any insight into the answer? Thanks for your time, Bob Heller

Re: Question on 15.31

at many points. In fact, I would expect a more gradual roll-off in the near field than in the far field (unless you were close enough to the EUT to be in the quasi-static region). -- From: rehel...@mmm.com To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Question on 15.31 Date: Fri, Jan 21, 2000, 3:49

RE: Question on 15.31, Near-field

5:50 AM To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: Question on 15.31 I have not heard back fron the FCC on the following question. Does anyone have any insight into the answer? Thanks for your time, Bob Heller = -- Forwarded by Robert E. Heller

RE: Question on 15.31

: Question on 15.31 Tha paragraphs are from FCC Part 15. === -- Forwarded by Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US on 01/21/2000 05:49 AM --- Robert E. Heller 01/21/2000 05:49 AM

Re: Question on 15.31

EMC Laboratory Fax: 651-778-6252 To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org cc: Subject: Question on 15.31 I have not heard back fron the FCC on the following

Question on 15.31

cc: Subject: Question on 15.31 I have not heard back fron the FCC on the following question. Does anyone have any insight into the answer? Thanks for your time, Bob Heller = -- Forwarded by Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US on 01/21/2000 05:46