Re: 950 Pollution degree detirmination

2001-04-09 Thread John Woodgate
<3ad1daa8.9000...@ma.ultranet.com>, Robert Johnson inimitably wrote: >The following is from IEC TC74's document 74/585/NP on Equipment >Installed Outdoors, a proposed supplement to IEC 60950. >It has not been adopted, but give an idea of the current thinking in TC74. Well, I hope it's rejected

Re: 950 Pollution degree detirmination

2001-04-09 Thread Robert Johnson
The following is from IEC TC74's document 74/585/NP on Equipment Installed Outdoors, a proposed supplement to IEC 60950. It has not been adopted, but give an idea of the current thinking in TC74. IPX6 is not addressed, but reference is made back to IEC 60950 for Pollution degree 1. It looks li

RE: 950 Pollution degree detirmination

2001-04-03 Thread Massey, Doug C.
;s advocate as you did. I just wanted to hear a few opinions. Doug -Original Message- From: John Juhasz [mailto:jjuh...@fiberoptions.com] Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 1:35 PM To: Massey, Doug C.; 'IEEE Forum' Subject: RE: 950 Pollution degree detirmination Doug, Whil

RE: 950 Pollution degree detirmination

2001-04-02 Thread jrbarnes
The interpretation that IBM/Lexmark's safety folks have always given me is that Pollution Degree 1 applies to sealed units such as the inner layers of multilayer Printed Circuit Boards (PCB's) or potted modules. John Barnes Advisory Engineer

RE: 950 Pollution degree detirmination

2001-04-02 Thread John Juhasz
Doug, While I would tend to agree that this may be acceptable, and I would too like to see some sort of 'official' determination on this (I may have a similar situation arise in the next couple of months), I would like to play devil's advocate for a moment to further this discussion . . . As