Re: CISPR 11 & CISPR 22

2010-08-10 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In message , dated Tue, 10 Aug 2010, "ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen" writes: >I object…. So do I. You have misrepresented what I wrote and accused me of encouraging manufacturers to avoid compliance. This is extremely reprehensible indeed. Observance of any law requires that

RE: CISPR 11 & CISPR 22

2010-08-10 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
toweg 363 3047 BG Rotterdam T 31(0)104152426 F 31(0)104154953  Before printing, think about the environment. Van: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] Namens John Woodgate Verzonden: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 7:27 AM Aan: emc-p...@ieee.org Onderwerp: Re

Re: CISPR 11 & CISPR 22

2010-08-10 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In message <5AA25764446A4A7296F2174FC6877C0C@christopher>, dated Mon, 9 Aug 2010, Chris Wells writes: >I have an industrial product that has fallen under CISPR 11 but now has >an Ethernet port. > >Do I need to test to both?  Looking at competitors documentations that >is what they appear to be