RE: D of C - Who Signs?

I agree this is a good question, and have been following this with interest to see what crops up. One point worth making is that the DoC signatory is legally responsible under criminal law. Signing a DoC fraudulently claiming compliance is a criminal offence and such criminal liability cannot

Re: D of C - Who Signs?

I always thought that the signatory of these type of documents was signing as a representative of the corporation. I think some documents require that an officer of the company sign for this reason. They are assumed to be authorized to represent the corporation. --

RE: D of C - Who Signs?

Dear Scott: The product gets through, not based on your personal representation, but rather on the company's representation. Because companies are made up of living, breathing human beings, a company's representation always takes the form the signature of a living, breathing human

RE: D of C - Who Signs?

if you do but don't enforce them properly!! Regards John Allen Racal -- From: Scott Douglas[SMTP:s_doug...@ecrm.com] Sent: 11 November 1999 21:36 To: john.al...@rdel.co.uk; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject:RE: D of C - Who Signs? John, Good that you disagree, wouldn't want

RE: D of C - Who Signs?

It's the function that signs, not the person, therefore this person should add it's function the the DoC. Regards, Gert Gremmen Ing. == Ce-test, Qualified testing == Consultants in EMC, Electrical safety and Telecommunication Compliance tests for European standards and ce-marking Member of

RE: D of C - Who Signs?

those of my employer applies. -Original Message- From: Scott Douglas [mailto:s_doug...@ecrm.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 1:37 PM To: john.al...@rdel.co.uk; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: D of C - Who Signs? John, Good that you disagree, wouldn't want everybody just following

Re: D of C - Who Signs?

any different view. Regards John Allen Product System Safety Manager Racal Defence Electronics Ltd Bracknell UK -- From: Scott Douglas[SMTP:s_doug...@ecrm.com] Sent: 11 November 1999 13:39 To: reyno...@pb.com; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject:RE: D of C - Who Signs

RE: D of C - Who Signs?

[mailto:john.al...@rdel.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 11:55 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: D of C - Who Signs? Importance: Low Hi Folks I disagree strongly with Scott's assessment that the DoC has to be resigned for several very important and pragmatic reasons: a) To-date I have yet

RE: D of C - Who Signs?

- Dallas -Original Message- From: John Allen [SMTP:john.al...@rdel.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 10:55 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: D of C - Who Signs? Hi Folks I disagree strongly with Scott's assessment that the DoC has to be resigned for several very

RE: D of C - Who Signs?

To: reyno...@pb.com; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject:RE: D of C - Who Signs? The DoC must be re-signed. Scott s_doug...@ecrm.com ECRM Incorporated Tewksbury, MA USA -Original Message- From: reyno...@pb.com [mailto:reyno...@pb.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 10:16 AM To: emc-p

Re: D of C - Who Signs?

Tony, Very good question. The person that signs the DOC is doing so as a representative of the company he/she works for. If he/she ends their employment the replacement person does not have to re-issue the DOCs. It is the company that is making the declaration, not the individual. The

RE: D of C - Who Signs?

The DoC must be re-signed. Scott s_doug...@ecrm.com ECRM Incorporated Tewksbury, MA USA -Original Message- From: reyno...@pb.com [mailto:reyno...@pb.com] Sent: Thursday, November 11, 1999 10:16 AM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: D of C - Who Signs? Importance: Low Hello!