RE: EN 61000-3-2/A14

2000-10-09 Thread O'Shaughnessy, Paul
x27;Shaughnessy -Original Message- From: O'Shaughnessy, Paul [mailto:paul_oshaughne...@affymetrix.com] Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 2:56 PM To: 'wo...@sensormatic.com'; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: EN 61000-3-2/A14 Absolutely correct - I was making the assumption that the &q

RE: EN 61000-3-2/A14

2000-10-09 Thread O'Shaughnessy, Paul
org Subject: RE: EN 61000-3-2/A14 Don't forget that an EMC standard cannot be used to self-declare compliance until and unless it is published in the OJ. Richard Woods --- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee

RE: EN 61000-3-2/A14

2000-10-09 Thread WOODS
To: 'Nick Rouse'; Friedemann Adt Cc: EMC Subject: RE: EN 61000-3-2/A14 Right - the dop is the first date upon which you MAY employ a new standard for compliance. The dow is the day by which any conflicting (ie the old standard) must be withdr

RE: EN 61000-3-2/A14

2000-10-09 Thread O'Shaughnessy, Paul
ble. Paul O'Shaughnessy -Original Message- From: Nick Rouse [mailto:100626.3...@compuserve.com] Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 3:08 PM To: Friedemann Adt Cc: EMC Subject: Re: EN 61000-3-2/A14 Fred, The dow is the date at which conflicting standards must be withdrawn. For an ammendme

Re: EN 61000-3-2/A14

2000-10-07 Thread Nick Rouse
ver period you may use only the new amended version. Nick Rouse - Original Message - From: "Friedemann Adt" To: ; Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 6:56 PM Subject: Re: EN 61000-3-2/A14 > > > I tried to refresh my memory about quoted abbreviations but even using the Off

Re: EN 61000-3-2/A14

2000-10-06 Thread Friedemann Adt
I tried to refresh my memory about quoted abbreviations but even using the Official Journal's search engine I got not beyond 'DOW Jones Industrial'. Thus I like to appeal to any merciful soul out there to straighten me out.. dow: is the date at which the standard is enforced and therefore the