Re: EN 61010-1 2001 and IEC61010-3

2002-03-30 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that John Woodgate wrote (in ) about 'EN 61010-1 2001 and IEC61010-3', on Fri, 29 Mar 2002: >OK, in UK you need to find a trade association or similar non-commercial >body such as a learned society to sponsor your membership of the BSI >committee EPL/66 that parallels IEC TC66

Re: EN 61010-1 2001 and IEC61010-3

2002-03-29 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Andrew Wood wrote (in ) about 'EN 61010-1 2001 and IEC61010-3', on Fri, 29 Mar 2002: >> Apologies. Although I used my address in the original posting, I omitted it >from my reply. >> Hence you assumed I was in US. OK, in UK you need to find a trade association or simila

RE: EN 61010-1 2001 and IEC61010-3

2002-03-29 Thread Andrew Wood
> -Original Message- > From: John Woodgate [SMTP:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] > Sent: 28 March 2002 16:41 > To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org > Subject: Re: EN 61010-1 2001 and IEC61010-3 > > > > In the USA, I suppose you have to find someone who is a m

Re: EN 61010-1 2001 and IEC61010-3

2002-03-28 Thread John Woodgate
I read in !emc-pstc that Andrew Wood wrote (in ) about 'EN 61010-1 2001 and IEC61010-3', on Thu, 28 Mar 2002: > >Thanks for the reply. > > > ..The matter should be referred back to IEC SC62A so that >the error can be >> corrected.. >> >> > How does a mere morta

RE: EN 61010-1 2001 and IEC61010-3

2002-03-28 Thread Andrew Wood
Thanks for the reply. ..The matter should be referred back to IEC SC62A so that the error can be > corrected.. > > How does a mere mortal go about such an excercise? best regards Andy. This e-mail and its contents may be confidential, pr

RE: EN 61010-1 2001 and IEC61010-3

2002-03-28 Thread ron_wellman
Hello Andrew, To the best of my knowledge, IEC 61010-1:2001 is not intended to be the base standard for previously existing 61010 part 2's or 3's. The second edition of IEC 61010-1 stands alone until the various parts 2 and 3 are updated and reference the second edition. In my opinion, you are be