it) would it not be an incidental radiator?
Regards
Chris Colgan
From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:72146@compuserve.com]
Sent: 01 October 2003 22:05
To: richwo...@tycoint.com; ieee pstc list
Subject: RE: FCC part 15 verification
Richard Woods wrote:
An audio amplifier that processes signals
it not be an incidental radiator?
Regards
Chris Colgan
From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:72146@compuserve.com]
Sent: 01 October 2003 22:05
To: richwo...@tycoint.com; ieee pstc list
Subject: RE: FCC part 15 verification
Richard Woods wrote:
An audio amplifier that processes signals over 9 kHz
Richard Woods wrote:
An audio amplifier that processes signals over 9 kHz is considered to be
an unintentional radiator and must be verifified.
I don't believe I've heard of the FCC actually requiring analog audio gear
to be verified, though even a cheap record player with 10 KHz audio does
International
From: WOODS, RICHARD
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:40 PM
To: Emc-Pstc (E-mail)
Subject: RE: FCC part 15 verification
Such equipment is considered to be an incidental radiator (does not
intentionally generate/use rf) and is not covered by the Part 15 rules.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic
Such equipment is considered to be an incidental radiator (does not
intentionally generate/use rf) and is not covered by the Part 15 rules.
Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International
From: Colgan Christopher [Soundcraft UK]
[mailto:christopher.col...@soundcraft.com]
Sent:
5 matches
Mail list logo