RE: FCC part 15 verification

2003-10-03 Thread Meunier, Eric
it) would it not be an incidental radiator? Regards Chris Colgan From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:72146@compuserve.com] Sent: 01 October 2003 22:05 To: richwo...@tycoint.com; ieee pstc list Subject: RE: FCC part 15 verification Richard Woods wrote: An audio amplifier that processes signals

RE: FCC part 15 verification

2003-10-02 Thread Colgan Christopher [Soundcraft UK]
it not be an incidental radiator? Regards Chris Colgan From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:72146@compuserve.com] Sent: 01 October 2003 22:05 To: richwo...@tycoint.com; ieee pstc list Subject: RE: FCC part 15 verification Richard Woods wrote: An audio amplifier that processes signals over 9 kHz

RE: FCC part 15 verification

2003-10-01 Thread Cortland Richmond
Richard Woods wrote: An audio amplifier that processes signals over 9 kHz is considered to be an unintentional radiator and must be verifified. I don't believe I've heard of the FCC actually requiring analog audio gear to be verified, though even a cheap record player with 10 KHz audio does

RE: FCC part 15 verification

2003-10-01 Thread richwo...@tycoint.com
International From: WOODS, RICHARD Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:40 PM To: Emc-Pstc (E-mail) Subject: RE: FCC part 15 verification Such equipment is considered to be an incidental radiator (does not intentionally generate/use rf) and is not covered by the Part 15 rules. Richard Woods Sensormatic

RE: FCC part 15 verification

2003-10-01 Thread richwo...@tycoint.com
Such equipment is considered to be an incidental radiator (does not intentionally generate/use rf) and is not covered by the Part 15 rules. Richard Woods Sensormatic Electronics Tyco International From: Colgan Christopher [Soundcraft UK] [mailto:christopher.col...@soundcraft.com] Sent: