com
www.thermo.com/esd
One Thermo, committed to integrity, intensity, innovation & involvement
From: Peter L. Tarver [mailto:peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:09 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: IEC and EN standard relationships
Mike - I'
Mike - I'd like to understand who is making any such
commands to ANSI, et al. While I understand there is a move
(and has existed for some time) to migrate to the IEC format
for standards, there is no entity that I am aware of issuing
dicta to standards bodies in the US.
ANSI --
ANSI sponsors
Fax: +1 978 275 0850
michael.hopk...@thermo.com
www.thermo.com/esd
One Thermo, committed to integrity, intensity, innovation & involvement
From: richhug...@aol.com [mailto:richhug...@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 5:50 AM
To: j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
I read in !emc-pstc that richhug...@aol.com wrote (in <1e0.13a69d51.2ceb
5...@aol.com>) about 'IEC and EN standard relationships' on Tue, 18 Nov
2003:
>I did not have the intention of singling you out, only of finishing
>our thread.
>
I would not have made that comment if I had realised t
John,
I did not have the intention of singling you out, only of finishing our thread.
It has disappointed me that, seemingly, the great majority of information flow
on this thread has been due to individuals in Europe explaining how CENELEC
standards relate to IEC standards but not how standards
I read in !emc-pstc that richhug...@aol.com wrote (in <126.349fcefb.2cea
1...@aol.com>) about 'IEC and EN standard relationships' on Mon, 17 Nov
2003:
>I did read what you wrote, which was "There are always
>differences".
Do you pick up on everyone else's posts like this, or are you af
John,
I did read what you wrote, which was "There are always differences".
If you look at what I wrote, you will see that I gave an example of a standard
where the CENELEC version of the IEC standard has no Common Modifications, no
Special National Conditions and no 'A' Deviations. So where ar
I read in !emc-pstc that richhug...@aol.com wrote (in <1e4.13640b3e.2ce6
b...@aol.com>) about 'IEC and EN standard relationships' on Fri, 14 Nov
2003:
>There are not always technical deviations between IEC and EN
>standards, for instances there are no differences in the body of
>the
John,
There are not always technical deviations between IEC and EN standards, for
instances there are no differences in the body of the standard between the
latest versions of IEC 60825-1 and EN 60825-1. Of course, CENELEC standards
have a Date of Withdrawal of conflicting standards which IEC sta
I read in !emc-pstc that Ralph McDiarmid
wrote (in <67C475A5ECE7D4118AEC0002B325CAB60581A444@BCMAIL1>) about 'IEC
and EN standard relationships' on Fri, 14 Nov 2003:
>What would be an example of a Common Deviation?
>
Common Modification.
An example from BS EN 60950-1:2001 is the addition of Eu
I read in !emc-pstc that Ablewisp - Compliance Engineers
wrote (in ) about 'IEC and EN standard relationships' on Fri, 14 Nov 2003:
>A client located outside the EU has a large number of IEC standards.
>They would like to determine the differences between their IEC standards
>and the equivale
What would be an example of a Common Deviation?
thanks,
Ralph McDiarmid, AScT
Compliance Engineering Group
Xantrex Technology Inc.
From: John Allen [mailto:ja014d7...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: November 14, 2003 12:13 PM
To: Ablewisp - Compliance Engineers; Emc-Pstc
Subject: Re: IEC and EN
Stuart,
Technically, BS EN 60xxx is the same as NF 60xxx with the exception that the BS
version is in English and the NF version is in French. All language variants
of an EN contain all national differences and Common Modifications.
If you look at the listing of standards in the OJEC you will
Stuart
As many people in this group can tell you, when CENELEC adopts an IEC as an EN
(almost always under the same numeric reference) it declares any Common
deviations in an annex at the back of the EN version - hence the need to (in
theory, at least) buy the EN!
However, any deviations in IE
14 matches
Mail list logo
