RE: RF testing question

2001-05-09 Thread Kevin Harris
-Original Message- From: Price, Ed [mailto:ed.pr...@cubic.com] Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 2:47 PM To: 'Kevin Harris'; EMC-PSTC (E-mail) Subject:RE: RF testing question Kevi

RE: RF testing question

2001-05-08 Thread Price, Ed
hock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis >-Original Message- >From: Kevin Harris [mailto:harr...@dscltd.com] >Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:40 AM >To: 'Ken Javor'; EMC-PSTC (E-mail) >Subject: RE: RF testing question > > > >Hi Ken, > >Let me try to explain it bet

Re: RF testing question

2001-05-08 Thread Ken Javor
" , "EMC-PSTC (E-mail)" >Subject: RE: RF testing question >Date: Tue, May 8, 2001, 6:39 AM > > Hi Ken, > > Let me try to explain it better. The standard asks that you stop reducing > the signal strength one you cross the 25% threshold. I would imagine that it > would

RE: RF testing question

2001-05-08 Thread Kevin Harris
lto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com] Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 10:48 PM To: Price, Ed; 'Kevin Harris'; EMC-PSTC (E-mail) Subject: Re: RF testing question Either I am being dense, or there is not enough

Re: RF testing question

2001-05-08 Thread Ken Javor
dear, departed brain cells)? -- >From: "Price, Ed" >To: "'Kevin Harris'" , "EMC-PSTC (E-mail)" >Subject: RE: RF testing question >Date: Mon, May 7, 2001, 1:47 PM > > > Kevin: > > You are actually testing a signal-to-nois

RE: RF testing question

2001-05-07 Thread Price, Ed
Kevin: You are actually testing a signal-to-noise ratio. The desired signal is reduced until you get to a certain level of degradation (which is unique to the receiver you have chosen). You then use that level to determine the amount of undesired (interfering) signal. You apply that undesired sig