I read in !emc-pstc that Andre, Pierre-Marie pierre-
marie.an...@intel.com wrote (in 9985493A802AD5118C4E0090274627535EC2EE
@swsmsx34.isw.intel.com) about 'Regulatory General Discussion : ouput
of Compliance group', on Mon, 17 Dec 2001:
The good argument is really in the FULL implication of the
Message-
From: Doug McKean [mailto:dmck...@auspex.com]
Sent: samedi 15 décembre 2001 01:26
To: EMC-PSTC Discussion Group
Subject: Re: Regulatory General Discussion : ouput of Compliance group
Andre, Pierre-Marie wrote:
So has anybody some thoughts or argument on the measurement
or evaluation
: Regulatory General Discussion : ouput of Compliance group
Andre, Pierre-Marie wrote:
So has anybody some thoughts or argument on the measurement
or evaluation of an Compliance Group ?
Well, I'd hate to let the dirty little secret out of the bag for those
of
us who would fall under
Andre, Pierre-Marie wrote:
So has anybody some thoughts or argument on the measurement
or evaluation of an Compliance Group ?
Well, I'd hate to let the dirty little secret out of the bag for those
of
us who would fall under such and evaluation. Important in such an
evaluation would be that
4 matches
Mail list logo
