RE: Why routine hipot is required.

2000-09-02 Thread Gert Gremmen
Hi Mike, If I understand well the computer power supply has a IEC 730 power supply input and the mounting in a computer frame would not alter the way the supply is connected to the mains. (plug-in directly in the supply through a enclosure hole). Then the computer does not need HiPot testing

RE: Why routine hipot is required.

2000-09-01 Thread Price, Ed
-Original Message- From: Mike Morrow [mailto:mi...@ucentric.com] Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 10:40 AM To: EMC Society Subject: Why routine hipot is required. I've been asked why a routine hipot test is required on an end assembly computer when it uses a Listed power

RE: Why routine hipot is required.

2000-09-01 Thread Bandele Adepoju
Mike, I have in the past had UL/CSA hi-pot testing waived for the production line testing of the end product based on the specific method of installation of the power supply in the end product. Bandele Jetstream Communications, Inc. badep...@jetstream.com -Original Message-

RE: Why routine hipot is required.

2000-09-01 Thread Kazimier Gawrzyjal
Mike, In my experience, the purpose of the end-assembly, 100% mfg. hi-pot test is to check the integrity of the electrical connections and of the required isolation levels. On the manufacturing end, any number of events can create a disturbance in the insulation of the product. These can often

Re: Why routine hipot is required.

2000-09-01 Thread Rich Nute
Hi Mike: I've been asked why a routine hipot test is required on an end assembly computer when it uses a Listed power supply that has already been hipot tested. So far I don't like the way I've worded my response. Basically what I've said is that a power supply is approved as a

RE: Why routine hipot is required.

2000-09-01 Thread Dick Grobner
Basically - high potential testing is a means to check the integrity (safety) of the wiring/components and construction used in the front end before the power supplies. I have two free publications, from two companies that manufacture high potential testers, that explain the process and needs

Re: Why routine hipot is required.

2000-09-01 Thread Pryor McGinnis
Mike, I made the same mistake. The power supply was recognized. - Original Message - From: Pryor McGinnis c...@prodigy.net To: Mike Morrow mi...@ucentric.com; EMC Society emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 12:31 PM Subject: Re: Why routine hipot is required

RE: Why routine hipot is required.

2000-09-01 Thread Joshua Wiseman
Mike, I have had instances on the manufacturing line were the unit would fail the Hipot or Ground Bond test. The same holds true. The power supply is an approved part and was tested by the power supply house. With this information alone I would recommend doing the tests on the end product. Josh

RE: Why routine hipot is required.

2000-09-01 Thread Loop, Robert
Mike: Here's the beef. The hi-pot test on the completed assembly, or final product, should be done as close as possible to the point of production where the product is boxed up for shipping and/or storage. The purpose of this is to try and find a defect in the primary side of the product

RE: Why routine hipot is required.

2000-09-01 Thread John Juhasz
Message- From: Eric Petitpierre [mailto:eric.petitpie...@pulse.com] Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 8:33 AM To: Mike Morrow Subject: Re: Why routine hipot is required. Mike, It would be an easier job to explain if the supply was Recognized rather than Listed. The best way I

Re: Why routine hipot is required.

2000-09-01 Thread Pryor McGinnis
Mike, Back in my days as Compliance Engineer for ATT Global Information Solutions (NCR), I was successful in obtaining UL/CSA waiver for production line hipot testing of the end product on the basis of using a listed power supply that had already been subjected to hipot as a part of the power