Re: Site Validation above 1GHz per CISPR16-1-4 for a 3m Semi-anechoic Chamber

2010-08-06 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Thank you, Bob. I excerpt several paragraphs from the standard for your reference and commet. Figures and tables are deleted. " 8.2.2 Site validation procedures This subclause describes the required procedures for evaluating SVSWR. 8.2.2.1 Antenna requirements To provide illumination o

Re: Site Validation above 1GHz per CISPR16-1-4 for a 3m Semi-anechoic Chamber

2010-08-06 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 20:18:11 -0700 (PDT), Bob Richards wrote: > >>>Is there any special equipment needed?  I have two of 3117 horn antenna > and an Agilent N5182A in my workplace.<<< > > I have not done this procedure yet, but have read up on it some. I > don't have a copy of the standard handy

Re: Site Validation above 1GHz per CISPR16-1-4 for a 3m Semi-anechoic Chamber

2010-08-05 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
>>>Is there any special equipment needed? I have two of 3117 horn antenna and an Agilent N5182A in my workplace.<<< I have not done this procedure yet, but have read up on it some. I don't have a copy of the standard handy right now, but I believe one of the antennas (the one moved around the tu

Re: Site Validation above 1GHz per CISPR16-1-4 for a 3m Semi-anechoic Chamber

2010-08-05 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 14:27:20 -0400, Grace Lin wrote: > Could you please share your experience if you have done site validation > above 1GHz per CISPR16-1-4 (S-VSWR) for a 3m semi-anechoic chamber? I would > like to learn how much work involved to meet this requirement. More > specifically: >

Site Validation above 1GHz per CISPR16-1-4 for a 3m Semi-anechoic Chamber

2010-08-05 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Dear Members, Could you please share your experience if you have done site validation above 1GHz per CISPR16-1-4 (S-VSWR) for a 3m semi-anechoic chamber? I would like to learn how much work involved to meet this requirement. More specifically: 1. How much absorber need to be added? I was edu