Re: Uncertainty Calculations for ETS 300 086 Radiated Emissions M easurements

2006-02-16 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In message 20060215174652.842.qm...@web30506.mail.mud.yahoo.com, dated Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Doug Beckwith dougbeckw...@yahoo.ca writes Isn't CISPR 16-4 the preferred method? This is what was specified to us by our accrediting agency. No. Because the ETSI reference is dated, that is the reference

RE: Uncertainty Calculations for ETS 300 086 Radiated Emissions M easurements

2006-02-15 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
Hi, Isn't CISPR 16-4 the preferred method? This is what was specified to us by our accrediting agency. Regards Doug --- Sykes, William Thomas (Tom) wsy...@lucent.com wrote: All: Elliott: If one looks in the back of TR 100028-1 V1.3.1, under Document History, one will find: History

Re: Uncertainty Calculations for ETS 300 086 Radiated Emissions M easurements

2006-02-15 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
In message f5f54e2ec6fec14aac3c9f28e8ee7eb80b8db...@nj9620exch002u.mh.lucent.com, dated Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Sykes, William Thomas (Tom) wsy...@lucent.com writes All: Elliott:   If one looks in the back of TR 100028-1 V1.3.1, under Document History, one will find:   History Document history

RE: Uncertainty Calculations for ETS 300 086 Radiated Emissions M easurements

2006-02-15 Thread emc-p...@ieee.org
All: Elliott: If one looks in the back of TR 100028-1 V1.3.1, under Document History, one will find: History Document history Edition 1 March 1992 Publication as ETR 028 Edition 2 March 1994 Publication as ETR 028 V1.3.1 March 2001 Publication, so there was no 1998 version. Of course,