[SMTP:edward.fitzger...@ets-tele.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 1999 7:17 AM
To: EMC-PSTC (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Worldwide ITE Requirements
Richard,
Either you missed out some of my corrections under Russia or someone has
dared to contradict me!(only joking!). Applying the GOST R mark
: WOODS, RICHARD [mailto:wo...@sensormatic.com]
Sent: 07 May 1999 15:24
To: 'emc-pstc'
Subject: Worldwide ITE Requirements
Thank you to everyone that provided comments. In some cases, the replies
were contradictory, so I had to use my best judgement on the reliability
of
the source. It came to my
Thank you to everyone that provided comments. In some cases, the replies
were contradictory, so I had to use my best judgement on the reliability of
the source. It came to my attention that there are more severe requirements
for equipment for domestic use, so I have restricted my chart to business
Richard,
Your compilation of the international compliance requirement for ITE is
very useful.
However, I've to point out that for Singapore, there is a safety mandatory
requirement.
The safety requirement is a PSB safety mark that is required to be affixed
onto the product once it has been granted
I have compiled all that I know or think I know about worldwide safety and
EMC compliance requirements for ITE in the attached document. Sources for
the information include personal experience, agency and CB Scheme web sites
and previous e-mails from this list group. All of the information is
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 1999 10:26 AM
To: 'emc-pstc'
Subject: Worldwide ITE Requirements
I have compiled all that I know or think I know about
worldwide safety and EMC compliance requirements for ITE in the attached
document. Sources
6 matches
Mail list logo
