This is SF feature request #1536176 submitted in Aug 2006
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1536176&group_id=6744&atid=356744
As far as I can tell this is a useful feature and it should be possible
to implement.
I think right now all moves are queued up as canon-command w
I want to have the rapid (G00) override separate from the federate (G01,
etc) override. We use this on a first run when you want to cut at the
programmed federate, and watch the rapid moves for collisions with the part,
fixture or clamps. The procedure is one hand on the program stop button,
one
Tony Bussan wrote:
> I have searched all over and cannot find any indication of how to
> implement rapid override with EMC. Can anyone point me where I should
> be looking?
I'm not exactly sure what you mean by "rapid overide". There is
a feedrate override slider on TkEMC and Axis that affects
Tony,
Scanning them in would be very much appreciated.
thanks
Stuart
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priorit
jcalvo wrote:
> we would like to develop a milling machine-with
> the Linux EMC software and need PC hardwere to control 4 axis AC
> brushless motor with encoders + spindle motor
> and minimum 32 IO for others functions
> Can help and tell wich are the best
> hardwere
I don't know abou
jcalvo wrote:
> we would like to develop a milling machine-with
> the Linux EMC software and need PC hardwere to control 4 axis AC
> brushless motor with encoders + spindle motor
> and minimum 32 IO for others functions
> Can help and tell wich are the best
> hardwere
>
> jcalvo
Th
John Kasunich wrote:
> Andrew Ayre wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>> From: John Kasunich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>>> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Newbie Help Needed - Losing Steps
>>> Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 19:46:09 -040
we would like to develop a milling machine-with
the Linux EMC software and need PC hardwere to control 4 axis AC
brushless motor with encoders + spindle motor
and minimum 32 IO for others functions
Can help and tell wich are the best
hardwere
jcalvo--
Jeff Epler wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 07:18:08AM -0500, Jeff Epler wrote:
>> EMC 2.1.x is unlikely to work on Ubuntu 7.10. However, the development
>> version has been improved in various ways for compatability with newer
>> versions of Ubuntu.
>>
>> On Ubuntu 7.10 the default amount of "loc
I have searched all over and cannot find any indication of how to implement
rapid override with EMC. Can anyone point me where I should be looking?
Thanks,
Tony Bussan
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM
Stuart,
I think we have the books for your drives. I need to double check the model
numbers this weekend. 33 amps is what our drives and motors are rated at
for continuous stall. The fuses to the motor are 25 amp slow blow. I can
probably scan them in if you would like. We got full documentati
I have searched all over and cannot find any indication of how to implement
rapid override with EMC. Can anyone point me where I should be looking?
Thanks,
Tony Bussan
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM
Stuart,
I think we have the books for your drives. I need to double check the model
numbers this weekend. 33 amps is what our drives and motors are rated at
for continuous stall. The fuses to the motor are 25 amp slow blow. I can
probably scan them in if you would like. We got full documentati
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 07:18:08AM -0500, Jeff Epler wrote:
> EMC 2.1.x is unlikely to work on Ubuntu 7.10. However, the development
> version has been improved in various ways for compatability with newer
> versions of Ubuntu.
>
> On Ubuntu 7.10 the default amount of "locked memory" for regular
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Geert De Pecker wrote:
>Gene,
>
>The rewiring is indeed something of the past. I did just the same, had a
>very simple breakout with rc filtering and switching the pins to comply
>with the xylotex. But since the changed hal, there is no need anymore.
>
>Ha. Hope the guy me
Gene,
The rewiring is indeed something of the past. I did just the same, had a
very simple breakout with rc filtering and switching the pins to comply
with the xylotex. But since the changed hal, there is no need anymore.
Ha. Hope the guy measured before using this cable!
I'm assuming there won'
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
>On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Geert De Pecker wrote:
>>Jon, Gene,
>>
>>The Vref's is correct. I've checked these and for the new board version
>>(the 4 axis) it is around 1.8V and for the old board approx 3V.
>>
>>What bothers me the most is that I have th
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Geert De Pecker wrote:
>Jon, Gene,
>
>The Vref's is correct. I've checked these and for the new board version
>(the 4 axis) it is around 1.8V and for the old board approx 3V.
>
>What bothers me the most is that I have the problem on both the old 3
>axis and the more recent
Jon, Gene,
The Vref's is correct. I've checked these and for the new board version
(the 4 axis) it is around 1.8V and for the old board approx 3V.
What bothers me the most is that I have the problem on both the old 3
axis and the more recent 4 axis board which I guess would rule out the
xylotex b
19 matches
Mail list logo
