Hi,
is it possible to write a g-code program setting, for example, a linear motion
distance with a halui parameter? My goal is to use a "pyvcp scale" to set the
position I want to move to: G0 X[pyvcp.dimension]
Thank you
Luigi
-
Dear Steve
sub/endsub lines and loading the files
sub/endsub lines.
They do actually also run w/o the M30 command at the end, so...
-sub/endsub
I have no parameters to pass from the master to the subs
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
___
Emc-users ma
1 The medical grade RFI filters have a much smaller capacitance between
line and ground, and usually have more series inductance. It can be
tough to find medical style line filters with high current ratings.
Plus, they're expensive...
2. I recently spoke with an engineer from North Shore Safety (a
To generate lots of debug messages:
In your.ini file section [RS274NGC] add the line
LOG_LEVEL = 999
Then the file emc_log will get a log containing the interpreter activity
regarding o-words, subroutines, etc. You probably don't want this
enabled when you are doing something usefu
2009/10/5 Matt Shaver :
>
> 1 The medical grade RFI filters have a much smaller capacitance between
> line and ground, and usually have more series inductance. It can be
> tough to find medical style line filters with high current ratings.
> Plus, they're expensive...
Annoyingly, the filter I boug
Hi all,
(For Peter) I think I found the main problem with tuning the X and Y axes. I
used the registry values of the old system to set the initial parameters for
EMC, and goofed on interpreting the accel parameters. In the Galil world,
these are in encoder counts / sec^2 rather than units per sec
Eric H. Johnson wrote:
> My question now is about angular axes. While the X and Y axes have on the
> order of 5000 counts per inch, the rotational axis only has 51.1 counts per
> degree (18400 per revolution) If I use 18400 for my INPUT_SCALE, I can tune
> the axis rather easily. Of course in this
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:42 -0400, "Eric H. Johnson"
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> (For Peter) I think I found the main problem with tuning the X and Y
> axes. I
> used the registry values of the old system to set the initial parameters
> for
> EMC, and goofed on interpreting the accel parameters. In the
I finally got the chance to try Chris' threading patch:
http://timeguy.com/cradek-files/emc/0001-Improve-initial-threading-synchronization.patch
Before : http://imagebin.ca/view/XLxWqSm.html
After : http://imagebin.ca/view/RYa7Qqpm.html
Watching it cycle after cycle it was very inconsistent befor
I have found a work-around, but wondering if anyone can point me to a
better solution.
I'm building a second CNC machine (another EMCO F1 with steppers),
using the same type of Sound Logic breakout board I used for my first
machine. However, I didn't use the charge-pump circuit on that first
John Kasunich wrote:
> Write down the PID gains that work when the scale is 18400. Then, since
> you are dividing the scale by 360 to get 51.1, you should be able to
> also
> divide the gains by 360, and the resulting PID results should be
> identical.
> Take the old gains, divide by 360, and try
11 matches
Mail list logo
