I just has a thought (those are getting rarer) about some motherboards
having a spread spectrum clocking ability to get them past the fcc's noise
limits.
Since I believe all this stuff really needs a steady heartbeat, should I be
checking the bios to see if perchance such a feature is
br...@majorsci.com wrote:
Have somebody known why LinuxCNC website is always compromised on
Google search?
You can find the attachment about this issue.
Do you really need to ask when you LOOK at what you posted?
There WAS a problem which now has far more to do with GOOGLE
And I was thinking that LinuxCNC was deemed to be a virus. :)
Cheers,
Peter
On 10/05/2012 5:53 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
br...@majorsci.com wrote:
Have somebody known why LinuxCNC website is always compromised on
Google search?
You can find the attachment about this issue.
Dave Caroline wrote:
Lester, er the real problem is repeated infestations, that is not googles
fault
But the 'primary listing' that google creates should at least contain live
information rather than cached stuff. What is even more irritating is that they
have flagged compromised pages so
Google will have a fast update rate for fast changing sites and their
pages but uses cache for speed and slow changing pages, again that is
right for google, it is for the sites to maintain themselves and stop
infestations.
The particular type of infestation that we get gives a different view
of
On 10 May 2012 09:44, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Perhaps I've been lucky, but I've never seen the download page 'compromised'
That is because the site was compromised in such a way that it served
different content to Googlebot than to consumer web browsers.
What completely baffles
On 10 May 2012 05:37, Mark Cason farmerboy1...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/46689581@N03/7168795700/in/set-72157629660267772/
Doesn't look like a Hall sensor, quite possibly a magnetic quadrature
sensor, but maybe just a tachometer.
2012/5/10 andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com:
What completely baffles me is _why_. If only Googlebot sees the spam,
what was the hacker trying to achieve?
Just to give a start to some conspiration theories (the following is
just my imagination):
Somebody (for example, authors of other cnc
On 10 May 2012, at 03:21, Jack Coats wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Scott Hasse scott.ha...@gmail.com wrote:
I presume many of you have seen the hype on the Raspberry Pi. Am I correct
in thinking that getting LinuxCNC to run on one of those would require an
arm-specific RTAI and
that is a nice solution. i had always imagined two screws coupled with a belt
or chain.
--- On Wed, 5/9/12, Mike Bennett mjb1...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Mike Bennett mjb1...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] First cut
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Looking at the bed construction, is the idea to use it with a vacuum
hold-down system?
--
atp
The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong.
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
The aim of the hackers that compromise the LinuxCNC
web site is to use it as a free mule to advertize
their junk. The mechanism is to show Google (and
not the general public) special links that show
up in the Google searches. These links then present
the desired junk pages when clicked on in the
On 10 May 2012 15:10, Steve Stallings steve...@newsguy.com wrote:
These links then present
the desired junk pages when clicked on in the
search results
No, the links always go to the correct LinuxCNC page. I have _tried_
to find the spam sites.
--
atp
The idea that there is no such thing as
Andy,
Perhaps I am wrong, but I think the reason that
you find the links going to the correct place
is that the LinuxCNC web site maintainers have
removed the hack, but Google is still showing
the old search results. At one time there was
definitely spam content on the web site.
Steve Stallings
On 5/9/2012 12:28 PM, Eric Keller wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Mark Casonfarmerboy1...@yahoo.com wrote:
My Dad stopped by, and gave me the motor yesterday afternoon. This
morning, I talked to the guy he got it from, and he said he buys old
sewing machines, replaces all
On Thu, 10 May 2012 00:43:12 -0400
Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Ask Jon Elson for a different opinion as an interested party who is a
component vendor and system integrator.
As for the ARM-specific real-time Linux that definitely is required,
Jon has been waiting for
On 05/10/2012 02:53 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
br...@majorsci.com wrote:
Have somebody known why LinuxCNC website is always compromised on
Google search?
You can find the attachment about this issue.
Do you really need to ask when you LOOK at what you posted?
There WAS a
On 5/10/2012 6:25 AM, Bill Hill wrote:
On 10 May 2012, at 03:21, Jack Coats wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Scott Hassescott.ha...@gmail.com wrote:
I presume many of you have seen the hype on the Raspberry Pi. Am I correct
in thinking that getting LinuxCNC to run on one of those
Looking for the cause of the apparent wild dither in the encoder output,
something that would either have to have been carved into the disk if
mechanical, and at the speed wobblies I'm getting, would absolutely have to
be visible in the slot spacing I can see, it is that gross!
But I can see,
On 5/10/2012 10:27 AM, dave wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2012 00:43:12 -0400
Kent A. Reedkentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Slightly OT but if one wants a non-intel cpu for motion control take a
look at Mesa's SOFTDMC. Implements a configurable accel/decel, jerk
limited and very fast servo
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.comwrote:
I love distributed control but it seems to me the sub-USD100 Intel
Atom-based integrated motherboards have sucked the air out of the room.
They're good enough and cheap enough.
When the P4 came around and had the
On 5/10/2012 1:50 PM, Eric Keller wrote:
We are using
Beagleboards for our autonomous robots, that is a really good place for
them.
Exactly my interest. Microcontroller-based solutions pale in comparison.
Regards,
Kent
Scott Hasse wrote:
I presume many of you have seen the hype on the Raspberry Pi. Am I correct
in thinking that getting LinuxCNC to run on one of those would require an
arm-specific RTAI and drivers for the device-specific I/O? Has anyone else
given any thought to this potentially disruptive
Kent A. Reed wrote:
As for the ARM-specific real-time Linux that definitely is required, Jon
has been waiting for several years for RT-Linux to be ported
satisfactorily to the BeagleBoard.
Slight error, it is RTAI that is not yet available on the Beagle. I
believe RT-Preempt
may be
Eric Keller wrote:
At least the ARM boards have the potential for replacing the PC, but a
Beagleboard is more expensive than a much more capable Atom.
This may not be quite true. The Beagle has integrated memory, and can
use very cheap
(4G, 8G) SD cards for hard drive. The Atom needs to have
On Thu, 10 May 2012 13:36:42 -0400
Kent A. Reed kentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/10/2012 10:27 AM, dave wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2012 00:43:12 -0400
Kent A. Reedkentallanr...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Slightly OT but if one wants a non-intel cpu for motion control
take a look at
26 matches
Mail list logo
