On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:46:00 -0600, you wrote:
>This might vary if you have a gantry. I have found back/right/top makes for
>easier workpiece loading in an enclosed gantry.
Not if that side of the machine is against the wall :)
It's also same as my mill, back is against wall, so it's consistent
On 10/17/2013 6:53 PM, Gregg Eshelman wrote:
> On 10/17/2013 11:53 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
>> The Intel 2500, 2700 and 2800 boards have the PowerVR video core on
>> board that is not compatible with anything other than Windows 7 32 bit
>> and maybe Windows 8.
>>
>> http://www.intel.com/support/graphic
On 10/17/2013 11:53 AM, Dave Cole wrote:
> The Intel 2500, 2700 and 2800 boards have the PowerVR video core on
> board that is not compatible with anything other than Windows 7 32 bit
> and maybe Windows 8.
>
> http://www.intel.com/support/graphics/intelgma3600/sb/CS-033597.htm
>
> Intel screwed up
This might vary if you have a gantry. I have found back/right/top makes for
easier workpiece loading in an enclosed gantry.
Charles
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Steve Blackmore wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 11:19:35 -0400, you wrote:
>
> >My approach ...
> >
> >Put the table in position and
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 11:19:35 -0400, you wrote:
>My approach ...
>
>Put the table in position and walk up to it like you are going to
>operate it...
>The bottom left hand corner - the corner nearest your left hand should
>be the origin. X increases to the right. Y increases away from you.
>If
I would like to get one or two more D525's at a decent price.. but.. everything
I've found is around $180.00 mark or better.. more than the original $79.00 I
use to get them at. If
anyone knows where to get them at a good price.. let me know.
On 10/17/2013 02:27 PM, Marius Liebenberg wrote:
>
If you search/google the mailing list you will find my benchmarks for those
machines. I can save you some time and tell the result: No way.
/S
2013/10/17 Marius Liebenberg
> Maybe not for showing cartoons but as machine controllers, they work
> just fine.
>
> On 2013/10/17 08:44 PM, Sven Wesley
Maybe not for showing cartoons but as machine controllers, they work
just fine.
On 2013/10/17 08:44 PM, Sven Wesley wrote:
> Oh, the never ending D525MW debate. I bought a few after all the good words
> here at the list. They are all crap, I can't even use them to show cartoons
> for my kids.
>
>
This isn't quite right. You can run LinuxCNC on the 2X00 series boards just
fine, but out of the box you won't have graphics acceleration. This is still
usable, but is slower than one would like. Once you install Ubuntu 10.04LTS
you will be greeted with a new hardware driver to install which
Oh, the never ending D525MW debate. I bought a few after all the good words
here at the list. They are all crap, I can't even use them to show cartoons
for my kids.
/S
2013/10/17 Marius Liebenberg
> Strange, I ran LCNC on the 2700 and 2800 boards.
>
> I can still get D525 as many as I desire
Strange, I ran LCNC on the 2700 and 2800 boards.
I can still get D525 as many as I desire.
On 2013/10/17 07:53 PM, Dave Cole wrote:
> The Intel 2500, 2700 and 2800 boards have the PowerVR video core on
> board that is not compatible with anything other than Windows 7 32 bit
> and maybe Windows 8.
2013/10/17 Dave Cole
> Intel is coming out with a new series of MITX boards, hopefully this
> fall that has Intel HD graphics on board and not the PowerVR core
>
That's great! I launched LinuxCNC sim on a laptop with 1.5GHz Celeron 1007
(Ivy Bridge, Intel HD) and it starts lightning fast as comp
On 17 October 2013 18:53, Dave Cole wrote:
> The Intel 2500, 2700 and 2800 boards have the PowerVR video core on
> board that is not compatible with anything other than Windows 7 32 bit
> and maybe Windows 8.
I wouldn't go _quite_ that far. I have a DN2800 as the development
machine, and it is "f
The Intel 2500, 2700 and 2800 boards have the PowerVR video core on
board that is not compatible with anything other than Windows 7 32 bit
and maybe Windows 8.
http://www.intel.com/support/graphics/intelgma3600/sb/CS-033597.htm
Intel screwed up on that series of boards and they realized it
aft
Probably the fact that the D525MW is EOL and hard to find at a good price.
On Oct 17, 2013, at 1:14 PM, Marius Liebenberg
wrote:
> Don
> What did you find wrong with the D525MW? I use them all the time. The
> latest is the D2700 series but I have found no real improvement that I
> could not
Marius:
The D525mw's are working great.
I have used them for a few years and
wanted to avoid building with outdated or obsolete stuff.
Thanks for your input.
Don
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Marius Liebenberg
wrote:
> Don
> What did you find wrong with the D525MW? I use them all the ti
Don
What did you find wrong with the D525MW? I use them all the time. The
latest is the D2700 series but I have found no real improvement that I
could notice at least.
On 2013/10/17 07:03 PM, Don Stanley wrote:
> Hi All;
> I am planning another CNC conversion.
> Is there now a better processor
Hi All;
I am planning another CNC conversion.
Is there now a better processor choice the Intel D525MW ?
Thanks
--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performan
It seems that the budget for the play is a lot greater than I am used
to for HS Plays..
Holland, MI is a nice city and apparently doing very well! (I'm in
Northern Indiana)
I'd probably use one of these controllers if I had to buy one new.
They don't get much cheaper than this but it is fully
My approach ...
Put the table in position and walk up to it like you are going to
operate it...
The bottom left hand corner - the corner nearest your left hand should
be the origin. X increases to the right. Y increases away from you.
If you do that you will have a "standard" layout and anyo
Your little gantry is the simplest for operators/programmers to understand
the tool motion. The tool and machine components move in the same direction.
The cincinnati gantries I have seen have the Y axis as the long axis. The X
axis across the short length of the gantry table. This may be a result
On Thursday 17 October 2013 09:25:21 Dave Cole did opine:
> On 10/16/2013 9:30 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > 'm guessing a lot more than that lathe costs ...
> > Yeah, I've heard rumors of 30 large. I'll limp along on this for that
> > sort of money. I can make me a polio style brace for far less t
In the past I have always chosen the longest axis to be my X axis.. and for
this machine I would also ... I do this because most of my work tends to be
longer in width than in height. So from the drawing to the machine, everything
is in the same orientation.
If you work consists of something lik
Bruce,
Here is a link to light sequencing and DMX decoding using an Arduino:
http://makezine.com/2011/11/01/light-sequencing-and-decoding-dmx-with-an-ard
uino/
I personally do not know much about theater lighting but thought this might
be of interest. If you are located in the US, the Arduino and
It really doesn't make any difference which is X and Y so long as they
connected to move in the correct direction for positive and negative
moves which align with the Cartesian axes. The arrow points are the
direction for positive moves.
http://www.oasys-software.com/faq/images/Image/1092-axes_
On 17 October 2013 11:21, Richard Thornton wrote:
> Could you please take a look at
> http://www.carving-cnc.com/cnc6040-series/cnc-6040z-s80-new-router-engraver-drilling-and-milling-machine.html
> and let me know whether you think the longest axis should be X or Y?
It is actually entirely up to
Thanks John!
Could you please take a look at
http://www.carving-cnc.com/cnc6040-series/cnc-6040z-s80-new-router-engraver-drilling-and-milling-machine.html
and let me know whether you think the longest axis should be X or Y?
Best Regards
Richard
>--
>
>Message: 5
>Dat
27 matches
Mail list logo
