Hi Rod,
This is actually a good example of why G64 is a bit confusing at first.
Since you haven't specified a Q word, G64 with a P tolerance by default
uses the same tolerance for the naive cam detector. What that means is
that your command here:
G64 P0.05
Is interpreted by LinuxCNC to mean thi
G0 P0.05 worked like a charm! Thanks Viesturs. I'll have to go read the
code to understand the behaviour.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Rod Fitzsimmons Frey wrote:
> Perhaps I'm confused about G64? From the docs:
>
> G64 is just blending and the naive cam detector is not enabled. G64 and
>
Perhaps I'm confused about G64? From the docs:
G64 is just blending and the naive cam detector is not enabled. G64 and
G64 P0 tell the planner to sacrifice path following accuracy in order to
keep the feed rate up. ... G64 P0 has the same effect as G64 alone
(above), which is necessary for bac
2014-04-11 22:15 GMT+03:00 Rod Fitzsimmons Frey :
> I've set G64 P0, which I think should eliminate motion mode concerns?
P0 means that max allowed deviation from defined path in order to maintain
velocity is equal to as much as total zero, so it really eliminates not
only concerns about motion
On 4/11/14 13:15 , Rod Fitzsimmons Frey wrote:
> Hi! I'm trying to get my programs running and I'm having trouble with the
> motion stuttering. It's not getting near my feed levels, and if I adjust
> the feed override while it's running it has no effect.
>
> I've set G64 P0, which I think should
Hi! I'm trying to get my programs running and I'm having trouble with the
motion stuttering. It's not getting near my feed levels, and if I adjust
the feed override while it's running it has no effect.
I've set G64 P0, which I think should eliminate motion mode concerns?
It's a servo machine r
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Viesturs L?cis wrote:
> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:26:02 +0300
> From: "[UTF-8] Viesturs L?cis"
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] 5i24?
>
> 2014-04-11 6:22 GMT+03:00 Peter C. Wallace :
2014-04-11 6:22 GMT+03:00 Peter C. Wallace :
> > 1) do I understand correctly that firmware for 2x 7i39s and few stepgens
> is
> > not that demaning and also smaller fpga of 5i24 will handle it with ease?
>
> It will fit easily (the 5I24-16's FPGA is about 2x the size of the 5I23
> FPGA)
And 5i2
