Well.. I don't think it is quite this bleak.
LinuxCNC has really not had any truly defined "direction or plan" for
the years I have been using it (5 or 6?). There have been groups of
people who have pushed in different directions
for various reasons, but I'm not aware of any truly "defined pl
Hmmm.
Reminds me of a company I worked for; two groups who could not talk. One
group (mine) was spending a pot of money (about a million bucks, 1980s
money) to keep an old computing system going, the other wanted to spend
that same pot of money on the next generation of computers.
I asked for, an
or put simple a big mess rather than a concerted effort on one
my thoughts are that machinekit has gone the 3d printing route and forgot
about real machines doing real work
but with an attempt to bring things up to date like nml etc .
and linuxcnc folks have lost the plot in the real world , so we
On 11/02/2014 09:18 AM, John Alexander Stewart wrote:
> Can someone tell me what the eventual plans for Machinekit and LinuxCNC is?
>
> Are the two forks going to come together again?
>
> I really like LinuxCNC, and I really like the idea of small, embedded CNC
> controllers, so I'm just wondering.
Can someone tell me what the eventual plans for Machinekit and LinuxCNC is?
Are the two forks going to come together again?
I really like LinuxCNC, and I really like the idea of small, embedded CNC
controllers, so I'm just wondering. (I have been loosely following the
machine kit google group; ma
