On 4 May 2016 at 14:39, giorgio foga wrote:
> #define MODBUS_RTU_RS485 1" nr.35 row .
> but I'm try to connect via TCP ... no-one macro for RS line is used from my
> code...
The .h file is #included and so the compiler will try to
@ andypug: row 34 & 35 of modbus-rtu.h "#define MODBUS_RTU_RS232 0 #define
MODBUS_RTU_RS485 1" nothing to do with my file.
Now I try to re-install libbmodbus 3.1.2 the error menthioned abose is
disappear but now I have a "undefined reference to . " every macros
used by *ctx
sorry ... fake email
> From: giorgiof...@hotmail.it
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 15:39:33 +0200
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] /usr/local/include/modbus/modbus-rtu.h:35: error:
> expected ‘)’ before ‘->’ token
>
> I try to re-install libmodbus 3.1.2 (previously
I try to re-install libmodbus 3.1.2 (previously I delete modbus folder from
/usr/include & /usr/local/include) ... now there is not the error mentioned
above, but now modbus.h is not recognise at all by ubuntu .
@andypugh " #define MODBUS_RTU_RS232 0
That was a funny eBay search.
According to Fotek the DC to DC version is SSR-40DD
eBay search for SSR-40DD shows many DC-rated SSRs for 60VDC output.
But I would be wanting 600V rating, and that ought to be a -H suffix.
SSR-40DD-H as an eBay search seems to show things very unrelated to
SSRs. I
On 4 May 2016 at 12:33, Steve Stallings wrote:
> We have been the victim of counterfeit Fotek SSR units. They
> looked fine, but required over 6 volts input to turn them on.
Have you pulled any apart to see what Triac they use?
You might be able to tell real Fotek from
We have been the victim of counterfeit Fotek SSR units. They
looked fine, but required over 6 volts input to turn them on.
That of course does not work with logic signals driving them.
Now we test all of them before selling them. What a pain.
Steve Stallings
www.PMDX.com
> -Original
On 4 May 2016 at 11:49, giorgio foga wrote:
> /usr/local/include/modbus/modbus-rtu.h:35: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘->’
> token
What does line 35 of that file look like?
I don't see any problem in the libmodbus source. (this is not actually
a LinuxCNC file)
--
atp
"A
It might be an unrecognized symbol. A macro may be missing for example if it is
not correctly spelled.
On Wed, 4 May 2016 12:49:13 +0200
giorgio foga wrote:
> At first --compile of my new usercomp for make LCNC server modbus obtain
> this error ... I have really
At first --compile of my new usercomp for make LCNC server modbus obtain this
error ... I have really not ideas how to find the solution. (after 6 hour
of work modbus file seems ok )
The file is attach in relate post on lcnc forum ... here ...
On 4 May 2016 at 02:38, Jon Elson wrote:
> OH WELL, there you have it! A 16 A triac in a 40 A labeled
> SSR! If there's one bogus thing in a device, you can depend
> on the WHOLE thing having bogus engineering.
Here is an analysis of one from bigclive:
Any thoughts? This is turning into a problem.
I don't know Tcl but I guess I could start messing with the script to
see why it's not getting the parameters.
Danny
On 5/2/2016 1:47 AM, Danny Miller wrote:
> I realized at least part of the [XHC_HB04_CONFIG] section just isn't
> having an
12 matches
Mail list logo