If you are looking for a small uP to use as a real-time controller, today
in 2017 its the ARM cortex M. The range is wide enough that you can find
one to suit. At the low end there is nothing to be gained by going with
say, Atmel AVR or some other 8-bit chip and at the high end are some
> > Maybe there is no need for a linux kernel. Have you read the manual for the
> > ARM CPU? Or what kind of CPU is it?
>
> RPI3 uses a quad-core ARMv8 (Cortex-A53) with all kinds of bells and
> whistles. Have you read the manual for that core?
No and I did not read the manual for the smaller
if you use your robot as ordinary probabily is not a good solution ...
but if you use a group of robot as machinery and if the pilot of this group
of robots is a user ... then that makes sense.
Any how i start my homework next mouth ... I'll send you updates on which I
can work/talk.
bkt
I also have a few robots, ordinary 6 axes. It must make sense to run the
robots without an ordinary GUI, connect remotely with a GUI then
programming.
2017-06-13 9:09 GMT+02:00 theman whosoldtheworld :
> @Niklas robots is the first candidate in my case Also because
@Niklas robots is the first candidate in my case Also because with
linuxcnc more than 9 axes you can not drive ...
@Chris ... real Good Job.
bkt
2017-06-12 20:09 GMT+02:00 Nicklas Karlsson :
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2017 18:22:07 +0200
> theman whosoldtheworld
On 06/13/2017 07:34 AM, Nicklas Karlsson wrote:
> Maybe there is no need for a linux kernel. Have you read the manual for the
> ARM CPU? Or what kind of CPU is it?
RPI3 uses a quad-core ARMv8 (Cortex-A53) with all kinds of bells and
whistles. Have you read the manual for that core?
I've been