On Friday 07 February 2020 23:09:46 Jon Elson wrote:
> On 02/07/2020 11:43 AM, N wrote:
> > Are however not sure the westinghouse system is better
> > there pressure is loaded then breaks are not used. First
> > time I heard about the accident there an oil train have
> > crashed then driver was sl
On 02/07/2020 11:43 AM, N wrote:
Are however not sure the westinghouse system is better
there pressure is loaded then breaks are not used. First
time I heard about the accident there an oil train have
crashed then driver was sleeping and left engine on
locomotive running I thought driver was d
> On 7 Feb 2020, at 23:45, Greg Bernard wrote:
>
> That is interesting and useful, but I wonder if probing the important
> features and simply tracing a scan or a photograph of the profile in CAD
> would be quicker and easier for that particular part.
Possibly, but at least this way it is def
That is interesting and useful, but I wonder if probing the important
features and simply tracing a scan or a photograph of the profile in CAD
would be quicker and easier for that particular part.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 11:25 AM John Dammeyer
wrote:
> Pretty cool.
> John
>
>
> > -Original Me
Hi John,
The mb2hal config file is standard ini format, the same as your config
ini file. As you can specify the ini file it allows you to use either
the config ini file or a separate file. It is not in any way compatible
with hal files.
Les
Then if it's designed to be included into a .hal
> > With how cheap realtime i/o is - I don't see the a lure of modbus.
>
> Modbus non-realtime should be plenty fast enough for spindle control
> unless you are doing position control of the spindle. I'm not sure about
> RTAI but if you are using preempt-rt mb2hal should be pretty close to
> re
> My 2 cents. For some things non-realtime i/o is fine. I have seen too
> many times where someone is maybe controlling a spindle and wonders why a
> change in direction takes so long and or isn't consistent. Once they
> switch over to something realtime (+/-10v or pwm) the issue goes away.
Hea
Then if it's designed to be included into a .hal file why not have it be a .hal
or .inc? Aside from the fact that it might break millions upon millions of
LinuxCNC installations.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: andy pugh [mailto:bodge...@gmail.com]
> Sent: February-07-20 5:30 AM
> T
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Newell [mailto:les.new...@fastmail.co.uk]
> Sent: February-07-20 4:40 AM
> To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Homann Designs ModIO
>
> > With how cheap realtime i/o is - I don't see the a lure of modbus.
>
> Modbus non-realti
Pretty cool.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: andy pugh [mailto:bodge...@gmail.com]
> Sent: February-07-20 1:59 AM
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Probing a Profile
>
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 23:52, andy pugh wrote:
>
> > And here is the G-code routin
Probably not, since it is more or less just an example configuration file with
significant annotation.
I was able to muddle my way through it to set up a machine. But I would find
it difficult to improve upon it. I think the problem is less with Mb2hal, than
it is just the scattered un organi
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 12:42, Les Newell wrote:
> You can specify the machine config ini file if you wish. The mb2hal ini
> file namespace does not conflict with anything else in the machine config.
That seems like a good reason for it to be a .ini file rather than
(say) a .mb file then.
--
atp
On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 13:14, Marius Alksnys wrote:
> http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Latency-Test, while I forgot
> the secret name of our mascot.
"Chips"
Which is why the penguin-making sample G-code file is called "3Dchips"
--
atp
"A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attac
I am making some latency-tests on different PCs. I would like to publish
some results..
I am trying to log-in to
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Latency-Test, while I forgot
the secret name of our mascot.
___
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-
With how cheap realtime i/o is - I don't see the a lure of modbus.
Modbus non-realtime should be plenty fast enough for spindle control
unless you are doing position control of the spindle. I'm not sure about
RTAI but if you are using preempt-rt mb2hal should be pretty close to
real time.
I
On 04.02.20 10:09, Jon Elson wrote:
> On 02/04/2020 09:17 AM, Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> > Aside from the stress and consternation in the LinuxCNC world about the
> > logo I like the new name a lot better.
> Yes, unless you have to type the longer name 20+ times a day!
Any good text editor will hav
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 23:52, andy pugh wrote:
> And here is the G-code routine I used.
Which is usable, but slightly flawed, in that if the probe _just_
catches a corner, the retract distance means that the "i missed"
circle can miss the work.
So a slight re-think needed there.
I made a video o
17 matches
Mail list logo
