On 12/12/20 1:41 PM, John Dammeyer wrote:
From: Nicklas SB Karlsson [mailto:nk@nksb.online]
To make a link to a file "ln -s filename filename", read manual page
"man ln", I always create the link in the wrong direction first time.
Oh gawd, that would mean using the command line. How antiquate
On Sunday 13 December 2020 14:22:08 John Dammeyer wrote:
> > From: Chris Albertson [mailto:albertson.ch...@gmail.com]
> >
> > I don't call it a problem. With the three board designs, you can
> > make a replacement for one of the "wings". splitting it up makes
> > the design of each really easy.
Yes I worked on old computers too. Back in the 1980's even on high-end Sun
workstations I used to get up and get some coffee while the C compiler
compiled by code.
You can't say "It is good enough because things were even worse 40 years
ago." Today I am 20 times more productive and can write so
Those T series Thinkpads are great, I was using a T61 until I got a T540
(which is awesome with an SSD), after using the Thinkpads I got a 2nd
hand ThinkStation S20. I even got my Mum a ThinkCentre.
On 14/12/20 6:39 am, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
Anno domini 2020 Sun, 13 Dec 11:22:08 -0800
John
Anno domini 2020 Sun, 13 Dec 11:22:08 -0800
John Dammeyer scripsit:
> [...]
> So I'll throw up the question. Is as you said, "the Beagle board is grossly
> underpowered", or has LinuxCNC/MachineKit suffered now the same Code Bloat
> that Microsoft Windows and Apple have, making the need for big
> From: Chris Albertson [mailto:albertson.ch...@gmail.com]
>
> I don't call it a problem. With the three board designs, you can make a
> replacement for one of the "wings". splitting it up makes the design of
> each really easy. And as said PCBs this size cost under $1 each even in
> tiny qu
I don't call it a problem. With the three board designs, you can make a
replacement for one of the "wings". splitting it up makes the design of
each really easy. And as said PCBs this size cost under $1 each even in
tiny quantity. So what I see you have here is the start of a family of
boards.
> From: Jon Elson [mailto:el...@pico-systems.com]
> On 12/13/2020 03:15 AM, Robert Murphy wrote:
> >
> > The reason for the switch from MK to Linuxcnc, the
> > Linuxcnc project just
> > has a better feel, IMHO, and the forum appears to have
> > more members that
> > use it in a commercial setting.
On 12/13/2020 03:15 AM, Robert Murphy wrote:
The reason for the switch from MK to Linuxcnc, the
Linuxcnc project just
has a better feel, IMHO, and the forum appears to have
more members that
use it in a commercial setting. I'm not saying that the
former statement
is gospel.
Yes, MachineKit
Den 2020-12-12 kl. 22:41, skrev John Dammeyer:
From: Nicklas SB Karlsson [mailto:nk@nksb.online]
To make a link to a file "ln -s filename filename", read manual page
"man ln", I always create the link in the wrong direction first time.
Oh gawd, that would mean using the command line. How anti
I designed and built them for what I wanted. Another thing that was on
my mind was some one switching from Mach 3 to Machine Kit. The goal was
to lay the I\O similar to what you would have with 2 Parallel ports.
For the time I used it work, and I still may put it back into use with
the little Elk
On Sunday 13 December 2020 02:35:24 John Dammeyer wrote:
> The problem with the boards are that they are a little too general
> purpose. So much more is needed above and beyond isolated outputs or
> inputs.
>
> For example, say you want RS485 for the spindle controller. Or maybe
> CANopen CAN bu
12 matches
Mail list logo
