Re: [Emc-users] jerk control

2021-08-25 Thread Alexander Brock
On 8/24/21 1:08 AM, andy pugh wrote: > I have a feeling that kinematics is not a problem in most cases, the > kins functions run fast enough to be used for finite-difference > differentiation / numerical integration. There is an elegant way to compute exact derivatives without computing

Re: [Emc-users] jerk control

2021-08-25 Thread andrew beck
Well I have two high speed CNC machines.. But they are all analog control. Probably no good for tinyg On Thu, 26 Aug 2021, 04:12 dave engvall, wrote: > IIRC emc was conceived as a vehicle to test intercommunication between > processes and as such higher level features such as lookahead, >

Re: [Emc-users] jerk control

2021-08-25 Thread Curtis Dutton
So for an abort I think would be still following the proscribed machine path in a coordinated fashion but stop as fast as possible within constraints. Sort of like dragging feed override to 0 as quickly as possible without violating constraints. For an e-stop it will be an uncoordinated stop.

Re: [Emc-users] jerk control

2021-08-25 Thread dave engvall
IIRC emc was conceived as a vehicle to test intercommunication between processes and as such higher level features such as lookahead,  smoothing, etc were not part of the master plan. In fact emc would not have had stepping if Matt Shaver had not requested it. Now on to the real subject of