On 06/09/2012 15:00, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2012, William Ratcliffe wrote:
>
>> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:52:01 +0100
>> From: William Ratcliffe
>> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>>
>> To: "Enhanced Machine
On 06/09/2012 14:55, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2012, William Ratcliffe wrote:
>
>> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:52:01 +0100
>> From: William Ratcliffe
>> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>>
>> To: "Enhanced Machine
On 05/09/2012 15:24, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> Snip
>
> It seems to sort of work
>> 'Sort of work' meaning does not hang the system; I can use the gpio on the
>> other channels OK. I am still not able to read or set any of the
No its just to make the compilation faster
On 30/08/2012 23:22, andy pugh wrote:
> On 30 August 2012 23:06, William Ratcliffe wrote:
>> -j2 to use two threads faster on a dual core
> I doubt that is the problem, but typically we "hide" a core from the
> system and run
-j2 to use two threads faster on a dual core
On 30/08/2012 20:07, andy pugh wrote:
> On 30 August 2012 19:20, William Ratcliffe wrote:
>
>> - I installed the live cd on a machine
>> - updated to 2.5.1 as per linuxcnc.org repository
>> - then uninstalled the debs
>&
On 30/08/2012 21:59, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
>
> Ill try and duplicate this with 2.5.1 sometime today
> Oops bspi is not supported in 2.5.1 :-)
Sorry I think it was unclear on my email. I had upgrade to 2.5.1 binary
version before then building the source using the master branch cloned
On 30/08/2012 19:27, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012, William Ratcliffe wrote:
>
>> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:20:24 +0100
>> From: William Ratcliffe
>> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>>
>> To: emc-users@lists.so
it working down this road; Any pointers would
be appreciated
On 30/08/2012 08:34, William Ratcliffe wrote:
> No crash prior to 'start'
>
> On 29/08/2012 23:45, andy pugh wrote:
>> On 29 August 2012 22:49, andy pugh wrote:
>>
>>> It looks like *CPLD_writ
being setup
and then breaks in the same way with no additional messages
I have forwarded the original email to Cliff.
On 30/08/2012 08:34, William Ratcliffe wrote:
No crash prior to 'start'
On 29/08/2012 23:45, andy pugh wrote:
On 29 August 2012 22:49, andy pugh wrote:
It
No crash prior to 'start'
On 29/08/2012 23:45, andy pugh wrote:
> On 29 August 2012 22:49, andy pugh wrote:
>
>> It looks like *CPLD_write is an initialised pointer, and that is bad.
>>
>> I am trying to comp the mesa_7i65 file to see if the c-code
>> initialises the pointers.
>> Curiously I am b
| (enable_out(5) != 0) << 5 | (enable_out(4) != 0) << 4
| (enable_out(3) != 0) << 3 | (enable_out(2) != 0) << 2
| (enable_out(1) != 0) << 1 | (enable_out(0) != 0);
On 29/08/2012 19:54, andy pugh wrote:
> On 29
Hi,
I've tried posting the message below onto emc-users but for some reason
it has not appeared. Are new posters vetted in the first instance? Or
does the attachment cause a problem?
Regards
Will
---
We are planning on using a HAL based system as a general machine
controller to replace a P
12 matches
Mail list logo
