On 6/16/2011 1:27 AM, gene heskett wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:56:34 AM Kent A. Reed did opine:
Gentle persons.
Recall that, on 6/3/2011 3:41 PM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
Hello, gentlemen!
I would like to ask, if anyone can suggest me a way to generate a
g-code for a
Gentle persons.
Recall that, on 6/3/2011 3:41 PM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
Hello, gentlemen!
I would like to ask, if anyone can suggest me a way to generate a
g-code for a single-time situation:
The part consists of 3 pieces of tubes - 2 of them need to be welded
to main piece.
What I need is
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:56:34 AM Kent A. Reed did opine:
Gentle persons.
Recall that, on 6/3/2011 3:41 PM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
Hello, gentlemen!
I would like to ask, if anyone can suggest me a way to generate a
g-code for a single-time situation:
The part consists of 3
On 6/3/2011 3:41 PM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
Hello, gentlemen!
I would like to ask, if anyone can suggest me a way to generate a
g-code for a single-time situation:
The part consists of 3 pieces of tubes - 2 of them need to be welded
to main piece.
What I need is to get a g-code that
2011/6/7 Kent A. Reed knbr...@erols.com:
I was away from my email when you started this thread. It doesn't look
like you received much actionable information.
Did you solve your problem?
Oh, yes, I have a g-code to play with! All the credit goes to Stuart Stevenson!
Viesturs
On Tuesday, June 07, 2011 09:56:59 AM Kent A. Reed did opine:
On 6/3/2011 3:41 PM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
Hello, gentlemen!
I would like to ask, if anyone can suggest me a way to generate a
g-code for a single-time situation:
The part consists of 3 pieces of tubes - 2 of them need to
Hello Viesturs,
if it really is a single time situation: Why bother with G code, why not
take that burner in your hand and fry them tubes down once and forever?
(I know, it's a question of principles ;-))
Peter
Viesturs Lācis schrieb:
Hello, gentlemen!
I would like to ask, if anyone can
Peter Blodow wrote:
Hello Viesturs,
if it really is a single time situation: Why bother with G code, why not
take that burner in your hand and fry them tubes down once and forever?
(I know, it's a question of principles ;-))
COME on - think
I simply presumed that Viesturs was saying
2011/6/4 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
I simply presumed that Viesturs was saying that he needed to demonstrate that
a
particular part of an on-going job could be machined by robot which would then
make putting that job into production practical. Or even win the job at all.
That right
On 6/4/2011 11:41 AM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
2011/6/4 Lester Caineles...@lsces.co.uk:
I simply presumed that Viesturs was saying that he needed to demonstrate
that a
particular part of an on-going job could be machined by robot which would
then
make putting that job into production
Hello, gentlemen!
I would like to ask, if anyone can suggest me a way to generate a
g-code for a single-time situation:
The part consists of 3 pieces of tubes - 2 of them need to be welded
to main piece.
What I need is to get a g-code that describes the intersection lines
of each 2 tube pieces.
I
On 3 June 2011 20:41, Viesturs Lācis viesturs.la...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to ask, if anyone can suggest me a way to generate a
g-code for a single-time situation:
The part consists of 3 pieces of tubes - 2 of them need to be welded
to main piece.
What I need is to get a g-code that
2011/6/3 andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com:
On 3 June 2011 20:41, Viesturs Lācis viesturs.la...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to ask, if anyone can suggest me a way to generate a
g-code for a single-time situation:
The part consists of 3 pieces of tubes - 2 of them need to be welded
to main
the motion would be a circle
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Viesturs Lācis viesturs.la...@gmail.comwrote:
2011/6/3 andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com:
On 3 June 2011 20:41, Viesturs Lācis viesturs.la...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to ask, if anyone can suggest me a way to generate a
g-code
I don't know the geometry but if it is a straight tube intersecting a
straight tube the motion would be three axis motion. It may be tilted to
some angle but the machine motion would be 3 axis motion.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Viesturs Lācis viesturs.la...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
On 3 June 2011 21:25, Viesturs Lācis viesturs.la...@gmail.com wrote:
My apologies, but I do not understand, what do You mean with Union of pipes.
A Union is one of the boolean operations offered by most solid
modelling packages.
By pipes I mean tubes
And how can I trace the intersection of 2
On 3 June 2011 21:36, Stuart Stevenson stus...@gmail.com wrote:
the motion would be a circle
I don't think it is. Even in the case of two equal-diameter tubes at
right-angles it is an ellipse (a special case of a conic section, for
a cylinder)
Projected along the axis of either tube it is a
Missing from the question is the actuals joins needed, angles and
types of cut, are the pipe sizes the same etc. and then there are the
moves for welding which are another problem due to welding
constraints.
Dave Caroline
Since you are welding them anyway... you might want to look at this.
It generates 2 axis Gcode to do a tube to tube coped joint and it looks
pretty simple.
*http://www.metalgeek.com/static/cope.pcgi
*Dave
On 6/3/2011 3:41 PM, Viesturs La-cis wrote:
Hello, gentlemen!
I would like to ask,
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:46 PM, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2011 21:36, Stuart Stevenson stus...@gmail.com wrote:
the motion would be a circle
I don't think it is. Even in the case of two equal-diameter tubes at
right-angles it is an ellipse (a special case of a conic
Viesturs Lācis wrote:
I would like to ask, if anyone can suggest me a way to generate a
g-code for a single-time situation:
The part consists of 3 pieces of tubes - 2 of them need to be welded
to main piece.
What I need is to get a g-code that describes the intersection lines
of each 2 tube
Hello again!
Now I have two questions, regarding correct G-code for 5 axis machine:
1) If I use G43 to compensate the nozzle length, how is EMC going to
behave, when rotary axis are moved?
What I want to achieve is that I would like to save appropriate tool
length, which corresponds to distance
2010/6/8 Viesturs Lācis viesturs.la...@gmail.com:
Hello again!
Now I have two questions, regarding correct G-code for 5 axis machine:
1) If I use G43 to compensate the nozzle length, how is EMC going to
behave, when rotary axis are moved?
What I want to achieve is that I would like to save
On 8 June 2010 15:07, Viesturs Lācis viesturs.la...@gmail.com wrote:
1) If I use G43 to compensate the nozzle length, how is EMC going to
behave, when rotary axis are moved?
Unless the kinematics module takes account of the tool length, I am
pretty sure that nothing else will.
--
atp
24 matches
Mail list logo
