Re: [Emc-users] FW: Telnet Interface questions

2009-01-11 Thread Alex Joni
>Ideally, you should only ever have one process writing to a buffer, and one >process reading (as per the NIST RCS handbook). For multiple processes >reading or writing to a single buffer, it would be better if a >secondary "channel" was spawned for each additional connection - This would >require

Re: [Emc-users] FW: Telnet Interface questions

2009-01-11 Thread paul_c
On Sunday 11 January 2009, AKSYS Tech Pty Ltd wrote: > Just a quick update.  I did as paul_c suggested and removed the queue > type from the *.nml file. This seems to have fixed my issue, and I now > seem to have error reporting coming back into my micro.  I can see where > Alex is coming from and

[Emc-users] FW: Telnet Interface questions

2009-01-10 Thread AKSYS Tech Pty Ltd
Hi Guys, Just a quick update. I did as paul_c suggested and removed the queue type from the *.nml file. This seems to have fixed my issue, and I now seem to have error reporting coming back into my micro. I can see where Alex is coming from and understand the possible problems of doing this.

[Emc-users] FW: Telnet Interface questions

2009-01-10 Thread AKSYS Tech Pty Ltd
Hi Guys, Thanks for the replies, I will give the changes a try and see where I get to - I will probably have to bug you more as I get deeper into the bowels of the beast. Greg, I probably will release everything open source, as EMC is a great piece of software and I would like to contribute wh