Hello,
I am using a mesa 5i20 for general purpose I/O. All pins are
gpio. This is what I am doing.
setp hm2_5i20.0.gpio.000.is_output 1
net classicladder.0.out-00 => hm2_5i20.0.gpio.000.out
When classicladder.0.out-00 is on hal config shows that
hm2_5i20
Paul Keeton wrote:
> I am using a mesa 5i20 for general purpose I/O. All pins are
> gpio. This is what I am doing.
>
> setp hm2_5i20.0.gpio.000.is_output 1
> net classicladder.0.out-00 => hm2_5i20.0.gpio.000.out
That all looks good.
> When classicladder.0.out-0
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Paul Keeton wrote:
> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:46:21 -0500
> From: Paul Keeton
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> To: EMC Users Group
> Subject: [Emc-users] Hostmot question
>
> Hello,
>
> I am u
without an export
license or other approval from the U.S. Department of State, is prohibited."
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Keeton"
To: "EMC Users Group"
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 7:46 PM
Subject: [Emc-users] Hostmot question
> Hello,
>
Paul Keeton wrote:
> An update on the IO issue. Maybe this will help someone else
>
> I have been working on this problem for the past few days and made no
> progress until this evening. I now have the outputs working as they should.
> This is what is required to make the Mesa 5i20 100%
are required to use that
statement for work related emails but I'm just having fun learning emc.
Thanks,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Sebastian Kuzminsky"
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 10:20 PM
Subject: Re:
Paul Keeton wrote:
> Thanks for the input. The motenc sample runs just fine by itself. It also
> runs just fine with the mesagpio.hal file and the I/O points on the motenc
> work just fine.
Can you pastebin the complete config that locks up your machine, and the
split hal file one that does not
Sure, I'll do it sometime today or tomorrow.
- Original Message -
From: "Sebastian Kuzminsky"
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Hostmot question
> Paul Keeton wrote:
>> Thank
