On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 13:41 -0700, doug metzler wrote:
Hey Kirk, did you ever go anywhere with this?
Thanks,
DougM
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:04 AM, gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
On Thursday, September 15, 2011 01:03:31 PM doug metzler did opine:
1) loopback test to confirm
Hey Kirk, did you ever go anywhere with this?
Thanks,
DougM
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:04 AM, gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
On Thursday, September 15, 2011 01:03:31 PM doug metzler did opine:
1) loopback test to confirm that the port is actually working? Esp.
if it would report
I played with showport.c to get what I needed at the time, then moved
on. Should showport.c be expanded, improved? What should be included,
improved? Is there already a program that does what showport does? Maybe
it should be incorporated into the present config utilities?
See:
1) loopback test to confirm that the port is actually working? Esp.
if it would report back what address it found the loopback adapter on.
2) something that that tells me who is holding or has handles to it?
(I'm sure this already exists but it would be nice to be encapsulated
in the same place)
On Thursday, September 15, 2011 01:03:31 PM doug metzler did opine:
1) loopback test to confirm that the port is actually working? Esp.
if it would report back what address it found the loopback adapter on.
2) something that that tells me who is holding or has handles to it?
(I'm sure this
