>
>
> Yes, You saw correctly - there is only one Hiwin rail with 2 blocks. I
> wanted one more rail some 200 - 300 mm lower for increased stiffness,
> but the client rejected that idea, because that would cost too much.
> The thing is that the frame already was done, when I joined the
> project, so
2011/5/23 Mark Wendt :
>
> Very nice. I noticed you have (and maybe it's just because of the angle
> the video was taken) only one linear rail that the base of your robot
> arm was running on. Do you have a second one underneath? If not, is
> there any noticeable lifting or movement of the beari
On 05/20/2011 04:04 PM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> 2011/5/11 Viesturs Lācis:
>> Hello guys!
>>
>> I decided to share a small preview on a robotic arm that I am building:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9olpU79H0o8
>
> Here is more:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mp9Dfu-aZn8
>
> Moving faster. A lo
2011/5/20 Andrew :
> Nice! What's the actual speed? Not possible to see on the screen.
10 000 mm/min
> When do you plan the first welding?
Within next few weeks I expect the delivery of torch, so that is when
I hope to start welding. Before that I have a time to finish attaching
homing sensors a
On 5/20/11, Andrew wrote:
> 2011/5/20 Viesturs Lācis
>
>> Here is more:
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mp9Dfu-aZn8
>>
>> Moving faster. A lot faster...
>>
>
> Nice! What's the actual speed? Not possible to see on the screen.
> When do you plan the first welding?
>
> Andrew
> --
2011/5/20 Viesturs Lācis
> Here is more:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mp9Dfu-aZn8
>
> Moving faster. A lot faster...
>
Nice! What's the actual speed? Not possible to see on the screen.
When do you plan the first welding?
Andrew
---
2011/5/11 Viesturs Lācis :
> Hello guys!
>
> I decided to share a small preview on a robotic arm that I am building:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9olpU79H0o8
Here is more:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mp9Dfu-aZn8
Moving faster. A lot faster...
Viestusr
On 5/14/2011 12:58 AM, dave wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 22:55 -0400, Kyle Kerr wrote:
>> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:15 PM, andy pugh
> It's mm, not inches, I expect.
>
39 inches/min is nothing to sneeze at.
>>>
>>> 1mm/min is 390 in/min.
>>>
>>> Even less to sneeze at.
>> DOH! da
2011/5/14 dave
>
> On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 22:55 -0400, Kyle Kerr wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:15 PM, andy pugh
> > >>> It's mm, not inches, I expect.
> > >>>
> > >> 39 inches/min is nothing to sneeze at.
> > >
> > > 1mm/min is 390 in/min.
> > >
> > > Even less to sneeze at.
> > DOH! dam
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 22:55 -0400, Kyle Kerr wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:15 PM, andy pugh
> >>> It's mm, not inches, I expect.
> >>>
> >> 39 inches/min is nothing to sneeze at.
> >
> > 1mm/min is 390 in/min.
> >
> > Even less to sneeze at.
> DOH! damn decimal :P
> >
Orders of magnitude
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:15 PM, andy pugh
>>> It's mm, not inches, I expect.
>>>
>> 39 inches/min is nothing to sneeze at.
>
> 1mm/min is 390 in/min.
>
> Even less to sneeze at.
DOH! damn decimal :P
>
> --
> atp
> "Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men"
-
On 14 May 2011 01:09, Kyle Kerr wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:38 PM, andy pugh wrote:
>
>>
>> It's mm, not inches, I expect.
>>
> 39 inches/min is nothing to sneeze at.
1mm/min is 390 in/min.
Even less to sneeze at.
--
atp
"Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guida
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:38 PM, andy pugh wrote:
>
> It's mm, not inches, I expect.
>
39 inches/min is nothing to sneeze at.
> --
> atp
> "Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men"
--
On 13 May 2011 22:08, Frank Tkalcevic wrote:
>> after taking that video I started
>> tweaking acceleration and velocity and the arm is capable to deliver
>> 1/min rapid speed of the "controlled point"
>
> I can't wait for a video of that.
It's mm, not inches, I expect.
--
atp
"Torque wrench
> after taking that video I started
> tweaking acceleration and velocity and the arm is capable to deliver
> 1/min rapid speed of the "controlled point"
I can't wait for a video of that.
--
Achieve unprecedented ap
2011/5/13 Viesturs Lācis :
> 2011/5/13 andy pugh :
>>
>> Was that a different issue to the spurious conversion of linear units
>> from degrees to radians inside genserkins?
>>
>
> No it is the same thing, I remember that You pointed it out, when I
> brought this up in the thread, where I described
2011/5/13 andy pugh :
>
> TYPE(link) I think.
> You also need to do the 1 to 1 conversion of jest back to joint in the
> second section for non-rotary joints
>
Ok, thanks! I will report back, when I will try to compile these
changes and test on simulated arm.
Viesturs
---
On 13 May 2011 12:01, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> Is that correct? Or should it be TYPE(link) instead of TYPE(t)?
TYPE(link) I think.
You also need to do the 1 to 1 conversion of jest back to joint in the
second section for non-rotary joints
--
atp
"Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools a
2011/5/13 Andrew :
>
> If I had a draft of what you want to get - kinematics, angles, joints etc,
> I'd try to figure it out.
> I know matrices, coordinate transformations etc.
Wow, thanks!!!
I will try to describe it all in a reasonable way and send You within
a few days.
2011/5/13 andy pugh :
>
On 13 May 2011 06:46, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> 2) there were differences in scale between joint and teleop modes -
> there was very large difference in the travel distance of linear
> joint, when compared if I jogged some number of units in joint mode or
> in teleop mode.
Was that a different iss
2011/5/13 Viesturs Lācis
> I was able to get genserkins to compile with my changes and move
> linear joints, but I was not able to overcome 2 things:
> 1) I found it impossible to allign the coordinate frame of arm with
> coordinate frame of the base - when I moved the arm along X, it
> _always_
2011/5/12 yann jautard :
> very nice work !
>
> steppers or servos ?
>
> what will be the purpose of this arm ?
>
Those are steppers and title of video says - arm for a welding robot,
so I suspect, that it will hold the welding gun.
2011/5/12 doug metzler :
> I'll be very interested to know if t
On 11 May 2011 12:20, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> Hello guys!
>
> I decided to share a small preview on a robotic arm that I am building:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9olpU79H0o8
Did you get genserkins working with sliding joints?
--
atp
"Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the g
I'll be very interested to know if there is any chatter at the end of the
arm during the welding process.
Great design!
Thanks,
DougM
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Viesturs Lācis
wrote:
> Thanks, guys! I am glad, that You like it :))
>
> 2011/5/11 gene heskett :
> >
> > Looking great! Ke
very nice work !
steppers or servos ?
what will be the purpose of this arm ?
Le 11/05/2011 13:20, Viesturs Lācis a écrit :
> Hello guys!
>
> I decided to share a small preview on a robotic arm that I am building:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9olpU79H0o8
>
> It is still a work-in-progress, bu
Thanks, guys! I am glad, that You like it :))
2011/5/11 gene heskett :
>
> Looking great! Keep us posted. What heating method will be used?
>
What do You mean with the method of heating?
If You mean - what kind of welding is that going to be, then - it will
be MIG welding machine.
Power source,
Very nice. Can this arm survive welding and its shielding/interference
issues?
i
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Andrew wrote:
> Very nice Viesturs!
>
> Add more details please. Worm gears? What's the long stroke lenght, which
> actuator is there?
>
> Andrew
> http://parallelrobots.blogspot.
Very nice Viesturs!
Add more details please. Worm gears? What's the long stroke lenght, which
actuator is there?
Andrew
http://parallelrobots.blogspot.com/
2011/5/11 Viesturs Lācis
> Hello guys!
>
> I decided to share a small preview on a robotic arm that I am building:
> http://www.youtube.
Viesturs,
That's very cool! Well done.
Mark
On 05/11/2011 07:20 AM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
> Hello guys!
>
> I decided to share a small preview on a robotic arm that I am building:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9olpU79H0o8
>
> It is still a work-in-progress, but the first stage of get
Hello guys!
I decided to share a small preview on a robotic arm that I am building:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9olpU79H0o8
It is still a work-in-progress, but the first stage of getting arm up
and moving has been completed.
Viesturs
--
30 matches
Mail list logo
