On 5/10/2012 10:11 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
> Kent A. Reed wrote:
>> As for the ARM-specific real-time Linux that definitely is required, Jon
>> has been waiting for several years for RT-Linux to be ported
>> satisfactorily to the BeagleBoard.
> Slight error, it is RTAI that is not yet available on the
On Thu, 10 May 2012 13:36:42 -0400
"Kent A. Reed" wrote:
> On 5/10/2012 10:27 AM, dave wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 May 2012 00:43:12 -0400
> > "Kent A. Reed" wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Slightly OT but if one wants a non-intel cpu for motion control
> > take a look at Mesa's SOFTDMC. Implements a configur
Eric Keller wrote:
> At least the ARM boards have the potential for replacing the PC, but a
> Beagleboard is more expensive than a much more capable Atom.
This may not be quite true. The Beagle has integrated memory, and can
use very cheap
(4G, 8G) SD cards for "hard drive". The Atom needs to ha
Kent A. Reed wrote:
>
> As for the ARM-specific real-time Linux that definitely is required, Jon
> has been waiting for several years for RT-Linux to be ported
> satisfactorily to the BeagleBoard.
Slight error, it is RTAI that is not yet available on the Beagle. I
believe RT-Preempt
may be avai
Scott Hasse wrote:
> I presume many of you have seen the hype on the Raspberry Pi. Am I correct
> in thinking that getting LinuxCNC to run on one of those would require an
> arm-specific RTAI and drivers for the device-specific I/O? Has anyone else
> given any thought to this potentially disrupti
On 5/10/2012 1:50 PM, Eric Keller wrote:
> We are using
> Beagleboards for our autonomous robots, that is a really good place for
> them.
Exactly my interest. Microcontroller-based solutions pale in comparison.
Regards,
Kent
---
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Kent A. Reed wrote:
>
> I love distributed control but it seems to me the sub-USD100 Intel
> Atom-based integrated motherboards have sucked the air out of the room.
> They're good enough and cheap enough.
>
When the P4 came around and had the horrible latency prob
On 5/10/2012 10:27 AM, dave wrote:
> On Thu, 10 May 2012 00:43:12 -0400
> "Kent A. Reed" wrote:
>
>
>
> Slightly OT but if one wants a non-intel cpu for motion control take a
> look at Mesa's SOFTDMC. Implements a configurable accel/decel, jerk
> limited and very fast servo cycle (<= 50 KHz ). Th
On 5/10/2012 6:25 AM, Bill Hill wrote:
> On 10 May 2012, at 03:21, Jack Coats wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Scott Hasse wrote:
>>> I presume many of you have seen the hype on the Raspberry Pi. Am I correct
>>> in thinking that getting LinuxCNC to run on one of those would require an
On Thu, 10 May 2012 00:43:12 -0400
"Kent A. Reed" wrote:
> Ask Jon Elson for a different opinion as an interested party who is a
> component vendor and system integrator.
>
> As for the ARM-specific real-time Linux that definitely is required,
> Jon has been waiting for several years for RT-Li
On 10 May 2012, at 03:21, Jack Coats wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Scott Hasse wrote:
>> I presume many of you have seen the hype on the Raspberry Pi. Am I correct
>> in thinking that getting LinuxCNC to run on one of those would require an
>> arm-specific RTAI and drivers for the de
On 5/9/2012 9:51 PM, Scott Hasse wrote:
> I presume many of you have seen the hype on the Raspberry Pi. Am I correct
> in thinking that getting LinuxCNC to run on one of those would require an
> arm-specific RTAI and drivers for the device-specific I/O? Has anyone else
> given any thought to this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/9/2012 8:51 PM, Scott Hasse wrote:
> I presume many of you have seen the hype on the Raspberry Pi. Am I
> correct in thinking that getting LinuxCNC to run on one of those
> would require an arm-specific RTAI and drivers for the
> device-specific
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Scott Hasse wrote:
> I presume many of you have seen the hype on the Raspberry Pi. Am I correct
> in thinking that getting LinuxCNC to run on one of those would require an
> arm-specific RTAI and drivers for the device-specific I/O? Has anyone else
> given any tho
I presume many of you have seen the hype on the Raspberry Pi. Am I correct
in thinking that getting LinuxCNC to run on one of those would require an
arm-specific RTAI and drivers for the device-specific I/O? Has anyone else
given any thought to this potentially disruptive platform in the context
15 matches
Mail list logo
