On 8/1/21 11:01 PM, Bari wrote:
Can we just call it -isms and -ists doing stuff?
nah, terminology/definitions are important, I'd settle to call it a
cancer of society though, and "stuff" them destroying it.
On 8/1/21 11:32 PM, R C wrote:
nah.. it's just a bunch of socialists/commies
Can we just call it -isms and -ists doing stuff?
On 8/1/21 11:32 PM, R C wrote:
nah.. it's just a bunch of socialists/commies that discovered they too
can claim the right to tell/demand etc. what others can say and do
etc. it's a fascist/marxist global trend
On 8/1/21 10:09 PM, Curtis Dutton wrote:
I find it curious that we have a COC followed up by the "master" question
in short succession. Am I mistaken that these events as somehow related?
Just asking for a friend.
I cannot think of a recent time that I have read an email on emcdev or
emcusers
Oh that "master" question was on the dev list.
Just us plebs in here.
On 8/1/21 11:09 PM, Curtis Dutton wrote:
I find it curious that we have a COC followed up by the "master" question
in short succession. Am I mistaken that these events as somehow related?
I find it curious that we have a COC followed up by the "master" question
in short succession. Am I mistaken that these events as somehow related?
Just asking for a friend.
I cannot think of a recent time that I have read an email on emcdev or
emcusers that I thought to myself "something must be
You really should be say it hasn't yet.
Mark
On 7/23/21 11:52 PM, Valerio Bellizzomi wrote:
Since you replied to my post: the topic is closed for me, I accept the
CoC and move on, it doesn't affect my ability to be part of the
LinuxCNC community nor my ability to share my work here and ask
Since you replied to my post: the topic is closed for me, I accept the
CoC and move on, it doesn't affect my ability to be part of the
LinuxCNC community nor my ability to share my work here and ask
questions.
Kind regards.
On Fri, 2021-07-23 at 14:13 -0500, Bari wrote:
> On 7/22/21 4:35 AM,
On 7/22/21 4:35 AM, Valerio Bellizzomi wrote:
I am making a big effort to understand why people is so adverse to
rules. Every project on sourceforge/github has to follow rules of the
site, and some projects have their own CoC.
If you agreed to behave correctly before, the CoC should not affect
ll via Emc-users
Sent: July 22, 2021 10:29 AM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Cc: Scott Harwell
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] The Code Of Conduct Fait Accompli
I'm a little slow on some of this. Could someone give me an example of a
"rules violation" please refer to an actual post
On Thu, 2021-07-22 at 17:13 +0200, grumpy via Emc-users wrote:
> >
> > From: Valerio Bellizzomi
> > Sent: Thu Jul 22 11:35:44 CEST 2021
> > To:
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] The Code Of Conduct Fait Accompli
> >
>
> From: Valerio Bellizzomi
> Sent: Thu Jul 22 11:35:44 CEST 2021
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] The Code Of Conduct Fait Accompli
>
>
> I am making a big effort to understand why people is so adverse to
> rules. Every pr
-
From: Scott Harwell via Emc-users
Sent: July 22, 2021 10:29 AM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Cc: Scott Harwell
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] The Code Of Conduct Fait Accompli
I'm a little slow on some of this. Could someone give me an example of a
"rules violation" pleas
Good luck finding one. The CoC is a solution in search of a problem.
Mark
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 10:32 AM Scott Harwell via Emc-users <
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> I'm a little slow on some of this. Could someone give me an example of a
> "rules violation" please refer to an
I'm a little slow on some of this. Could someone give me an example of a
"rules violation" please refer to an actual post. I read every email and every
recent topic post. In my unenlightened position I can't think of anything in
the last year that I have seen that was offensive.
Scott H
I am making a big effort to understand why people is so adverse to
rules. Every project on sourceforge/github has to follow rules of the
site, and some projects have their own CoC.
If you agreed to behave correctly before, the CoC should not affect
you, unless you want to misbehave now.
On Thu,
https://forum.linuxcnc.org/29-forum-announcements/42898-linuxcnc-code-of-conduct
"You cannot reply to this topic."
And if he decides to not reply to you or anyone else, what are you or
anyone else going to do about it? Not a threat, just asking.
Should be clear how this was and will be
The "discussion" is apparently over and we still have the Code of Conduct.
https://linuxcnc.org/CODE_OF_CONDUCT
It wasn't much of a discussion. Questions were asked but there were no
meaningful answers.
At the risk of offending any programmers in the LinuxCNC community by
appropriating
17 matches
Mail list logo
