On 12/14/2012 03:12 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> And I screwed that royally, its 185mv/A, not .185mv. Way too late. Or too
> early...
That's ok, it's late here, and I misread .185mV to be 185mV! 8-)
--
LogMeIn Rescue: Anyw
: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> > Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller \(EMC\)"
> >
> >
> >
> > Subject: [Emc-users] Thoughts on an electronic fuse
> >
> > Greetings all;
> >
> > The thought has occurred to me that an alternative to using
Gene Heskett
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:34:37
> To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller \(EMC\)"
>
> Subject: [Emc-users] Thoughts on an electronic fuse
>
> Greetings all;
>
> The thought has occurred to me th
Subject: [Emc-users] Thoughts on an electronic fuse
Greetings all;
The thought has occurred to me that an alternative to using the iffy, and
because the pid.error is subject to slight variations due to non-
linearities of speeds, making any comp type trip off have a best guess as
to when to activ
Greetings all;
The thought has occurred to me that an alternative to using the iffy, and
because the pid.error is subject to slight variations due to non-
linearities of speeds, making any comp type trip off have a best guess as
to when to activate, seems like a SWAG at best.
So, how about a sm
