> Meanwhile, I wonder if we could just enlarge it by a
> factor of 10 or 100 and forget about it for a while.
A binary order of magnitude would keep me happy for a long
time and a decimal order of magnitude would suffice forever.
I could put more smarts into my Eagle hole extractor, but
those d
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Chris Radek wrote:
snip
> Maybe doubling yours would keep you happy for a while. I am not sure
> what all would be involved in removing these limitations, and I don't
> know of anyone working on it currently. It would be nice if the
> tool table could be arbit
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 05:44:24PM -0400, Ed Nisley wrote:
> In Axis 2.4.0, is it true that the tool table can have only
> 48-ish entries?
I thought it was 56ish, but yes it's something like that.
> The problem is that Eagle's part libraries have a
> bewildering variety of hole diameters, which
In Axis 2.4.0, is it true that the tool table can have only
48-ish entries?
I'm drilling circuit boards from Eagle layouts, using a
script that extracts all the holes, sorts them by drill
diameter, then visits each set in nearest-neighbor order.
The problem is that Eagle's part libraries have
