On 28/10/16 06:57, Danny Miller wrote:
> You wouldn't likely save the g-code on the SD card at all.
>
> You'd have a wifi connection and load the g-code from your local network.
Or even better the USB stick one has always used to avoid even having a
network connection active?
> Those SD cards ar
You wouldn't likely save the g-code on the SD card at all.
You'd have a wifi connection and load the g-code from your local network.
Those SD cards are used for storing photos and video quickly.
Photographers and videographers use TONS of memory over and over., and
quite frankly I never heard o
The SD card will work for file storage but just remember a class 10 SD card
will write at 10MB per second or 80Mbps.
The write speed to the cache on a normal rotating disk is 6Gb or 6000Mbps.
That is about two orders of magnitude better but that is "cheating" as it
is only the interface speed. Th
On Thursday 27 October 2016 19:14:32 W. Martinjak wrote:
> On 2016-10-28 00:57, W. Martinjak wrote:
> > three fast micro-sd cards
>
> I forgot:
> One fine silver marker for labeling the sd-cards with sequential
> numbers. Believe me, it's really necessary.
I have at least 2 of those, someplace...
On Thursday 27 October 2016 18:57:15 W. Martinjak wrote:
> On 2016-10-27 23:07, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > I am getting the impression that a micro-sd would have both poor
> > loading performace, call a surveyor to measure write speeds. And
> > poor life in a filesystem environment. SSD w/sata would
On Thursday 27 October 2016 18:08:25 Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> On 10/27/2016 4:07 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > I am getting the impression that a micro-sd would have both poor
> > loading performace, call a surveyor to measure write speeds. And
> > poor life in a filesystem environment. SSD w/s
On 10/27/2016 04:07 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I am getting the impression that a micro-sd would have both poor loading
> performace, call a surveyor to measure write speeds. And poor life in a
> filesystem environment. SSD w/sata would be good, but the sata on a pi
> is a bad kludge from what I'm r
On 10/27/2016 6:14 PM, W. Martinjak wrote:
> I forgot:
> One fine silver marker for labeling the sd-cards with sequential numbers.
> Believe me, it's really necessary.
I use a Shaprie on a small piece of Scotch tape, that way I can remove
the labels and apply new when necessary. I know of others
For data storage most people will put the basic OS on the micro SD card and
then NFS mount user's home directories. Likely using automount. Don't put data
that changes on the SD card or then you will have to back it up
You likely do only accces the pi via ssh over wifi after you set it up.
>
On 2016-10-28 00:57, W. Martinjak wrote:
> three fast micro-sd cards
I forgot:
One fine silver marker for labeling the sd-cards with sequential numbers.
Believe me, it's really necessary.
--
"In der Wissenschaft siegt nie eine neue Theorie,
nur ihre Gegner sterben nach und nach"
Max Planck
---
On 2016-10-27 23:07, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I am getting the impression that a micro-sd would have both poor loading
> performace, call a surveyor to measure write speeds. And poor life in a
> filesystem environment. SSD w/sata would be good, but the sata on a pi
> is a bad kludge from what I'm r
On 10/27/2016 4:07 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> I am getting the impression that a micro-sd would have both poor loading
> performace, call a surveyor to measure write speeds. And poor life in a
> filesystem environment. SSD w/sata would be good, but the sata on a pi
> is a bad kludge from what I'm
I am getting the impression that a micro-sd would have both poor loading
performace, call a surveyor to measure write speeds. And poor life in a
filesystem environment. SSD w/sata would be good, but the sata on a pi
is a bad kludge from what I'm reading.
So, Bari, Charles S., etc, what are you
13 matches
Mail list logo
