On Thursday 01 January 2015 23:12:22 Sebastian Kuzminsky did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 01/01/2015 08:59 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
So, what amd64 flavor of Ubuntu stands the best chance of working
with the existing repo's? And which name do I then put in
/etc/apt/sources.list?
I run
On 01/02/2015 08:04 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 01 January 2015 23:12:22 Sebastian Kuzminsky did opine
I personally prefer Debian Wheezy, which works out of the box using
the new Live/Install Image. Instructions for that are here:
On Friday 02 January 2015 10:19:12 Sebastian Kuzminsky did opine
And Gene did reply:
On 01/02/2015 08:04 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Thursday 01 January 2015 23:12:22 Sebastian Kuzminsky did opine
I personally prefer Debian Wheezy, which works out of the box
using the new Live/Install
Greetings, and I hope everyone will have a better year in 2015;
Mint 17.1 LTS with cinnamon gui has arrived, called Rebecca. It looks
decent enough but the synaptic shipped for a package manager, is quite
broken. No mark all updates button for starters, and while it does
identify a group of
On 01/01/2015 10:12 PM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
On 01/01/2015 08:59 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
So, what amd64 flavor of Ubuntu stands the best chance of working with the
existing repo's? And which name do I then put in /etc/apt/sources.list?
I run LinuxCNC on Ubuntu Precise (12.04) on some of
On 01/01/2015 08:59 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
So, what amd64 flavor of Ubuntu stands the best chance of working with the
existing repo's? And which name do I then put in /etc/apt/sources.list?
I run LinuxCNC on Ubuntu Precise (12.04) on some of my machines. I'm
not a fan of the Ubuntu UI, but
