Re: [Emc-users] max joint number

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7xvqQeoA8c these is the best (definitely better than HONDA Asimo) It's a shame that google has sold boston dynamics hope for better robot project (maybe a robot D-wave driven over QUIC or better wifi bus ???.. ) bkt 2017-06-15 23:34 GMT+02:00

Re: [Emc-users] max joint number

good ... about axis number is for 2 arm robot ... not planning to partecipate to darpa race (for these year ;)) ... the pose number is more hight then world axis ... and actual axis number in g code, for 2 arm robot (18 axis) I think is quite good, because most part of work is on pose flag not in

Re: [Emc-users] max joint number

You are right. It takes 12 numbers to specify the location the orientation of two arms. But in a typical robot there will be more than 12 axis. If you look at the stat of the art, there could be 100+ axis, see below. With a typical robot the number of axis may not equal the number of degrees

Re: [Emc-users] max joint number

On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 09:36 -0700, Chris Albertson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 2:07 AM, andy pugh wrote: > > On 15 June 2017 at 08:08, theman whosoldtheworld > > wrote: > > > >> there are some possibility that the max joint/axis number become more

Re: [Emc-users] max joint number

On 15 June 2017 at 17:36, Chris Albertson wrote: > It depends on one's approach to a multi arm/leg robot.You can > treat it as two 6 DOF arms or > as one 12 DOF assembly. > I can certainly imagine a 2-arm robot using XYZ and UVW to position two arms. Though then

Re: [Emc-users] max joint number

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 2:07 AM, andy pugh wrote: > On 15 June 2017 at 08:08, theman whosoldtheworld > wrote: > >> there are some possibility that the max joint/axis number become more than >> 0-8 in future? >> > > It might well increase in the release,

Re: [Emc-users] max joint number

On 06/15/2017 03:41 PM, Bertho Stultiens wrote: > On 06/15/2017 03:02 PM, andy pugh wrote: >>> G00 1X1. 2X1.0200 3X14.950 4X10.9530... >>> something in this fashion comes to mind first >>> there may not be a YZABCIJK representation - just 1X through 15X >> That doesn't work with a conventional

Re: [Emc-users] max joint number

On 06/15/2017 03:02 PM, andy pugh wrote: >> G00 1X1. 2X1.0200 3X14.950 4X10.9530... >> something in this fashion comes to mind first >> there may not be a YZABCIJK representation - just 1X through 15X > > That doesn't work with a conventional G-code interpreter because spaces are > ignored. >

Re: [Emc-users] max joint number

On 15 June 2017 at 13:53, Stuart Stevenson wrote: > > G00 1X1. 2X1.0200 3X14.950 4X10.9530... > > something in this fashion comes to mind first > > there may not be a YZABCIJK representation - just 1X through 15X That doesn't work with a conventional G-code interpreter

Re: [Emc-users] max joint number

On 15 June 2017 at 13:46, Stuart Stevenson wrote: > G Code is just a symbolic way to represent something in a human readable > manner. > Indeed, and if we had a STEP_NC interpreter then perhaps we would need to also consider adding to the number of axes. -- atp "A

Re: [Emc-users] max joint number

one fifteen axis whatever(machine?) G00 1X1. 2X1.0200 3X14.950 4X10.9530... something in this fashion comes to mind first there may not be a YZABCIJK representation - just 1X through 15X For the human : big labels on each axis or 3D glasses to see the labels projected. At some point the

Re: [Emc-users] max joint number

G Code is just a symbolic way to represent something in a human readable manner. Another method could be used and would seem difficult for the humans to comprehend. On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 4:07 AM, andy pugh wrote: > On 15 June 2017 at 08:08, theman whosoldtheworld

Re: [Emc-users] max joint number

On 15 June 2017 at 08:08, theman whosoldtheworld wrote: > there are some possibility that the max joint/axis number become more than > 0-8 in future? > It might well increase in the release, but I am not sure how many machines need coordinated movement in more than 9

[Emc-users] max joint number

there are some possibility that the max joint/axis number become more than 0-8 in future? (0-17 / 0-26 ) Actually if I well undertand is possible use makinekit fork with multiple machinekit instance on same pc ... so same pc more than 0-8 joint ... but I investigate other possbility. bkt