Am 20.10.2012 um 22:18 schrieb Jon Elson:
Jon Elson wrote:
Michael Haberler wrote:
the - somewhat brittle - run-from-line feature has seen several fixes
related to this, both by cradek and me, in 2.5, see
I have another machine with a brand-new build from master, so I will
test
On 10/20/2012 04:18 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
If I select the line with the G01 move,
and do run from line, it performs that move, but never executes the
subroutine.
It sits there in some in-between state, forever.
I'm just throwing something in here with very limited knowledge of
what's going
Jon Elson wrote:
Michael Haberler wrote:
the - somewhat brittle - run-from-line feature has seen several fixes
related to this, both by cradek and me, in 2.5, see
I have another machine with a brand-new build from master, so I will
test on that one.
I should have thought of
All linked to this bug report I think, still not resolved, some of it
was supposed to be fixed in the master.
sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3440704group_id=6744atid=106744
regards
--
Everyone hates slow
Michael Haberler wrote:
the - somewhat brittle - run-from-line feature has seen several fixes related
to this, both by cradek and me, in 2.5, see
http://git.mah.priv.at/gitweb/emc2-dev.git/commit/f9085e20130e744df8c239eb6df67654995062cd
My production Bridgeport mill runs an older version, 2.0.4~pre,
built from the git repository. To upgrade this system, I may
have to replace the computer, it is pretty aged and limited in
memory and CPU speed.
Anyway, I ran the following program last night:
N10 G61
N20 O100 SUB
N30 G01 F10
