Gentle persons:
When the dust settles over some of the recent, long threads on subjects
like "G540 Test Update" and "BLDC" I hope the essences of the
subjects get distilled into useful pages on our Wiki.
Speaking of the Wiki , it could use a lot more
editorial work. Looking at the Recent C
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Kent A. Reed wrote:
>
> Speaking of the Wiki , it could use a lot more
> editorial work. Looking at the Recent Changes listing, I see the usual
> few suspects making progress but there is a lot of work left.
>
> Back in January, after the decision was announced to
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Kent A. Reed wrote:
>
> Speaking of the Wiki , it could use a lot more
> editorial work. Looking at the Recent Changes listing, I see the usual
> few suspects making progress but there is a lot of work left.
>
> Back in January, after the decision was announced to
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:45:49 -0400
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Kent A. Reed
> wrote:
> >
> > Speaking of the Wiki , it could use a lot
> > more editorial work. Looking at the Recent Changes listing, I see
> > the usual few suspects making progress but there is a
On 4/17/2012 11:33 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Kent A. Reed
> wrote:
>> Speaking of the Wiki, it could use a lot more
>> editorial work. Looking at the Recent Changes listing, I see the usual
>> few suspects making progress but there is a lot of work left.
>>
On 4/18/2012 1:45 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Kent A. Reed
> wrote:
>> >
>> > Speaking of the Wiki, it could use a lot more
>> > editorial work. Looking at the Recent Changes listing, I see the usual
>> > few suspects making progress but there is a lot of w
for section 2 Getting Started.
I have not yet gotten too far with CAD/CAM to generate gcode, but I
have a suggestion to run up the flagpole to see if anyone salutes. I
suggest we select 2 CAD/CAM solutions to include on the CD, with special
support in the wiki. One would allow complex thin
On 4/27/2012 6:59 PM, cogoman wrote:
> for section 2 Getting Started.
>
> I have not yet gotten too far with CAD/CAM to generate gcode, but I
> have a suggestion to run up the flagpole to see if anyone salutes. I
> suggest we select 2 CAD/CAM solutions to include on the CD, with special
> supp
