That's basically a crankshaft position sensor.
I got the link from another guy asking if we could use it on a machine.
The gear pitch needed is .160 so at full quad the resolution should be
.040 or about a mm. There is a data sheet link on the Allied
Electronics page.
The price I think was
On 11 November 2015 at 16:32, Dave Cole wrote:
> That's basically a crankshaft position sensor.
Some CPSes use a magnetic track (I have a few in a drawer).
They typically use a missing tooth (normally just a shorter tooth,
when it is a tooth) for index.
It would be nice
On 11/11/2015 12:23 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> On 11 November 2015 at 16:32, Dave Cole wrote:
>> That's basically a crankshaft position sensor.
> Some CPSes use a magnetic track (I have a few in a drawer).
> They typically use a missing tooth (normally just a shorter tooth,
>
On 10 November 2015 at 18:53, Greg Bentzinger wrote:
> Got an advert for this since I am an Allied customer and was wondering if
> this would be useful as a spindle sensor.
>
>
I too got that advertisement. If your spindle has a suitably fine gear on
it I think it would work fine. You'd still need to add a second sensor for
an index position in order to either thread or position the spindle for a
toolchanger.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Bentzinger
The resolution is determined by the number of teeth on the gear that is
being sensed by the two Hall effect sensors in that integrated Honeywell
sensor. For example, if you had a 100 tooth gear, you'd have 400
quadrature state changes per revolution. A spindle speed sensor doesn't
really
On Tuesday 10 November 2015 13:53:55 Greg Bentzinger wrote:
> Got an advert for this since I am an Allied customer and was wondering
> if this would be useful as a spindle sensor.
>
> http://www.alliedelec.com/lp/151110/honeywell/?utm_source=prod_med
>ium=email_campaign=151110_product
>
Certainly
On Tuesday 10 November 2015 14:07:34 andy pugh wrote:
> On 10 November 2015 at 18:53, Greg Bentzinger
wrote:
> > Got an advert for this since I am an Allied customer and was
> > wondering if this would be useful as a spindle sensor.
> >
> >
On Tuesday 10 November 2015 18:58:01 Bruce Layne wrote:
> The resolution is determined by the number of teeth on the gear that
> is being sensed by the two Hall effect sensors in that integrated
> Honeywell sensor. For example, if you had a 100 tooth gear, you'd
> have 400 quadrature state