Please let the chairs know if you have any agenda items for the EMU meeting at
IETF 120. As a reminder, EMU is shown in the preliminary agenda as meeting on
Tuesday from 13:00 to 15:00.
Thanks,
Joe and Peter
___
Emu mailing list -- emu@ietf.org
To
Dear EMU WG members,
Please pardon this interruption with a non-EMU topic.
The NomCom chair has asked that WG members be informed of the following
snafu that means there are far fewer NomCom volunteers than would normally be
in the pool. If you are at all interested in serving
Thanks for the comment, Murray. The milestones are there only for the new items
being added to charter. The other items are either relatively recently finished
or in their final stages, so we retained them for continuity. We could remove
the published items from the charter if they cause any
Group/IAB Review)".
On 3/7/24, 2:38 PM, "Peter Yee" mailto:pe...@akayla.com>>
wrote:
This is an adoption call for the eap.arpa Internet-Draft
(draft-dekok-emu-eap-arpa). This is an ancillary draft that Alan
DeKok briefed during the Prague (IETF 118) meeting. Seeing as
it pri
This is an adoption call for the eap.arpa Internet-Draft
(draft-dekok-emu-eap-arpa). This is an ancillary draft that Alan
DeKok briefed during the Prague (IETF 118) meeting. Seeing as
it primarily exists as a forward-looking extraction of certain
descriptive material and IAB .arpa domanrequests
I've drafted an update to the EMU charter to give us room to work on EAP-EDHOC
and EAP-FIDO (or whatever we end up calling it). I'd appreciate the WG looking
over the updated charter
(https://github.com/emu-wg/charter/blob/master/emu-charter.md) and replying to
the list with any thoughts you
Off-by-one-bug. That deadline is December 13th!
-Peter
On 11/29/23, 9:13 AM, "Peter Yee" mailto:pe...@akayla.com>>
wrote:
This is an adoption call for EAP-EDHOC (draft-ingles-eap-edhoc) [1].
This draft was originally briefed in Yokohama and while it didn't
This is an adoption call for EAP-EDHOC (draft-ingles-eap-edhoc) [1].
This draft was originally briefed in Yokohama and while it didn't
receive strong backing at that time, a short re-airing in Prague
showed that there's distinct interest in taking on this work. While
this work is not currently in
Peter Yee has requested publication of draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-14 as Proposed
Standard on behalf of the EMU working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis/
___
Emu mailing list
Emu
Alan,
I've also sent an inquiry to the IAB on the matter to see if they have
any thoughts. I'll post to the list if they come back with any opinions. Your
draft will also be helpful either way as we can decide whether to incorporate
their thoughts (if they've some concrete and coherent
That one’s on me, gents. I have the action to inquire and will do so ASAP.
-Peter
On 8/30/23, 3:29 AM, "Owen Friel (ofriel)" wrote:
Hi EMU Chairs,
I was looking to see if any minor updates are needed to
draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls-03 before
The agenda for the EMU session at IETF 117 has been posted as
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/117/materials/agenda-117-emu-00. Let us
know if you have any questions about it or you would like to be added to the
agenda - we still have time available, even for non-WG documents.
IETF 117 in San Francisco is approaching and this is the call for agenda
items. The EMU session is set for Friday afternoon (yeah, I know). Please
submit your requests for time on the agenda to the chairs.
Presumably, we will have 7170bis wrapped up before the meeting, otherwise
there might need
The current agenda for the IETF 116 EMU meeting can be found at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/116/materials/agenda-116-emu-02
For those of you who have requested presentation time, please upload
your slides soon. We've received 1 of 5 presentations so far and we're
We are now about one month out from IETF 116. Please inform the chairs if you
have items for discussion before the EMU WG at the upcoming meeting in Yokohama.
Cheers,
Joe and Peter
___
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
Peter Yee has requested publication of draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs-10 as
Informational on behalf of the EMU working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs/
___
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
Thanks for updating the document, John. Ill be generating the shepherd
write-up shortly to get the process moving.
-Peter
From: Emu On Behalf Of John Mattsson
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2023 7:19 AM
To: emu@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] I-D Action:
Based on the previous WGLC and feedback received on this WGLC, I believe
there's consensus in the WG to forward this document on to the IESG. Thank
you everyone who supplied input and to the authors for getting the document
this far.
Peter and Joe
-- Original message:
This is a second
Based on the supportive and engaged feedback on the mailing list, the chairs
are declaring rfc7170bis adopted by the WG. It looks like we're already
getting into a discussion of the content of the draft, which is fine.
Alan, please submit a WG version of the document for approval. From there,
the
This is a second working group last call for EAP-AKA' PFS
(draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs-08)[1]. As you will recall, this document had its
original WGLC in August. Feedback was minimal but positive. As briefed
during IETF 115[2], Jari and his colleagues have updated the document in
several key areas[3].
This is an adoption call for RFC 7170bis (draft-dekok-emu-rfc7170bis-00)[1].
I'd call this mostly a formality since it's pretty clear the WG is
interested in updating TEAP and TEAP was already adopted by the WG (back in
May 2011). With Alan having generated a new working version to host the
update
Joe and I have been discussing an interim that would probably be held in
January. December seems less likely given holiday schedules and vacations.
We'll probably have a Doodle poll out sometime soon to gauge the date and
time that works for the most participants.
The minutes from the IETF 115 EMU session have been published at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/115/materials/minutes-115-emu-202211071
530-00.
Thanks so much to Janfred Rieckers for the in-meeting notetaking. It's
greatly appreciated and crucial to a successful meeting.
Cheers,
Seeing as how we are less than a month away from IETF 115, please inform the
chairs if you have items for discussion at the upcoming meeting in London.
Cheers,
Joe and Peter
___
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
WG version.
Please incorporate the feedback garnered during the call for adoption.
Thanks,
Peter and Joe
-Original Message-
From: Emu On Behalf Of Peter Yee
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2022 9:58 PM
To: emu@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Emu] Adoption call for EAP-DPP
In retrospect, sending
!
Thanks,
Peter and Joe
-Original Message-
From: Peter Yee
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2022 1:12 PM
To: 'emu@ietf.org'
Subject: Adoption call for EAP-DPP
This is an adoption call for EAP-DPP (draft-friel-tls-eap-dpp-05)[1]. This
document aligns with the charter item to "D
This is an adoption call for EAP-DPP (draft-friel-tls-eap-dpp-05)[1]. This
document aligns with the charter item to "Define mechanisms by which EAP
methods can support creation of long-term credentials for the peer based on
initial limited-use credentials." The latest revision incorporates
Reviewer: Peter Yee
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
28 matches
Mail list logo
