Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths

I also vote for independent lengths to support crypto agility. Katrin On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Glen Zorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alan DeKok mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ... Please respond FOR or AGAINST making the input and output lengths independent. This consensus

Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths

: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Katrin Höper Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 10:42 AM To: Glen Zorn Cc: emu@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths I also vote for independent lengths to support crypto agility. Katrin On Fri, Aug 8, 2008

Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths

Please respond FOR or AGAINST making the input and output lengths independent. This consensus call will last until August 19. FOR ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths

Alan DeKok mailto://[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ... Please respond FOR or AGAINST making the input and output lengths independent. This consensus call will last until August 19. FOR ... ___ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org

Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths

Hi, Please respond FOR or AGAINST making the input and output lengths independent. This consensus call will last until August 19. I vote FOR independence. Stefan Winter -- Stefan WINTER Ingenieur de Recherche Fondation RESTENA - Réseau Téléinformatique de l'Education Nationale et de la

Re: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP-GPSK key lengths

Hi Alan, I vote FOR independent lengths, because it will promote algorithm agility. David On Aug 5, 2008, at 3:09 AM, Alan DeKok wrote: The current draft assumes that key lengths for MAC are the same as the MAC output length, and states this as a constraint. The counter- example is